Skip to main content

Abstract

In Britain the most direct involvement of the state in housing is the provision and management of what is popularly known as ‘council housing’, whereby the local authority under government supervision acts as a major housing developer and landlord. As Table 5.1 indicates, before the First World War there were virtually no council houses in Britain, but today about 30 per cent of the housing stock is occupied by tenants of the local authorities, though it seems that this steady growth over five decades has now reached its peak. The extent of direct government provision of housing in Britain exceeds by far the provision in other capitalist countries. In Western Europe governments fund workers’ housing through ‘quasi-public bodies’ similar to housing associations, while in the USA public housing only accounts for 2 per cent of the housing stock.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. See Public Housing in Europe and America, ed. J. S. Fuerst (London: Croom Helm, 1974);

    Google Scholar 

  2. and A. Heidenheimer, H. Heclo and C. Teich Adams, Comparative Public Policy (London: Macmillan, 1976) Chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Various interpretations are offered by the following: Housing Policy: Technical Volume 1 (London: HMSO, 1977), pp. 3–7; P. Wilding, ‘Towards Exchequer Subsidies for Housing 1906–1914’, Social and Economic Administration, vol. 6, no. 1 (1973); B. B. Gilbert, British Social Policy 1914–1939 (London: Batsford, 1970) Chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See A. S. Wohl, The Eternal Slum: Housing and Social Policy in Victorian London (London: Edward Arnold, 1977) p. 324.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Dickens, Social Change, Housing and the State, Centre for Environmental Studies Conference Paper (London: 1977) p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Foot, Aneurin Bevan: a Biography, vol. 2 (London: Davis-Poynter, 1973) p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Crossman, The Diaries of a Cabinet Minister, vol. 1, Minister of Housing 1964–66 (London: Hamish Hamilton and Jonathan Cape, 1975) p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. McCutcheon, ‘High Flats in Britain, 1945 to 1971’ in Political Economy and the Housing Question (London: Conference of Socialist Economists Housing Workshop, 1975) p. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See F. Berry, Housing: the Great British Failure (London: Charles Knight, 1974) p. 249.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Harloe, R. Issacharoff and R. Minns, The Organisation of Housing in London (London: Heinemann, 1974) p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Bowley, Housing and the State 1919–1944 (London: Allen & Unwin, 1945) p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  12. This is explained further in B. Kilroy, ‘How a Council Loses on Sales’, Roof, vol. 2, no. 3 (1977) pp. 76–80.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See S. Schifferes, ‘Council Tenants and Housing Policy in the 1930’s’ in Housing and Class in Britain (London: Conference of Socialist Economists Housing Workshop, 1976) p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See J. G. Bulpitt, Party Politics in English Local Government (London: Longman, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Parker, The Rents of Council Houses, Occasional Papers in Social Administration no. 22 (London: Bell, 1967), p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fair Deal for Housing, Cmnd. 4728 (London: HMSO, 1971). This was the White Paper which laid out the principles of the Housing Finance Act, 1972. For further discussion on this act see P. Beirne, Fair Rent and Legal Fiction (London: Macmillan, 1977) Chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See L. Sklair, ‘The Struggle Against the Housing Finance Act’ in The Socialist Register 1975, eds R. Miliband and J. Saville (London: Merlin, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  18. The council’s story and the context of the struggle is told in D. Skinner and J. Langdon, The Clay Cross Story (Nottingham: Spokesman, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wohl, The Eternal Slum, p. 188. See also G. Stedman Jones, Outcast London (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971) pp. 193–6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Webb, My Apprenticeship (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971) p. 267.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See J. Tarn, Five Per Cent Philanthropy (London: 1973) Chapter 8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Darner, Working Class Housing and Working Class Incorporation: Glasgow 1861–1919, unpublished paper given to the Conference of Socialist Economists Housing Workshop (1976) pp. 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. Darner, ‘Wine Alley: the Sociology of a Dreadful Enclosure’, Sociological Review, vol. 22 (1974) p. 225.

    Google Scholar 

  24. In a submission to a government committee in 1938 the Incorporated Society of Women Housing Managers suggested the further employment of women as managers because of ‘the greater facility with which they are able to establish friendly and confidential relations with the housewife, the real manager of the home’. Central Housing Advisory Committee, Management of Municipal Housing Estates (London: HMSO, 1938) p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Tucker, Honourable Estates (London: Gollancz, 1966) p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  26. C. Ward, Tenants Take Over (London: Architectural Press, 1974) p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. Wilson, Difficult Housing Estates (London: Tavistock Institute, 1963) p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  28. D. S. Byrne, Problem Families — a Housing Lumpenproletariat (Durham: Durham University Department of Sociology and Social Administration, 1974) p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Central Housing Advisory Committee, Council Housing Purposes, Procedures and Priorities, Cullingworth Report (London: HMSO, 1969) p. 252.

    Google Scholar 

  30. D. Evans, Where Do We Go From Here?: a Study of Eviction From Council Housing in Birmingham, M. A. Dissertation, Applied Social Studies Department, Warwick University (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  31. See B. Glastonbury, Homeless Near a Thousand Homes (London: Allen & Unwin, 1971) Chapters 3, 4, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See J. Baldwin, ‘Problem Housing Estates’, Social and Economic Administration, vol. 10 (1976) pp. 131–4. See also Whatever Happened to Council Housing? and Coventry’s Council Houses: the New Slums (London: Shelter, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  33. R. Means, Social Work and the Undeserving Poor, Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, University of Birmingham, Occasional Paper no. 37 (1977) p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. Lambert, B. Blackaby and C. Paris, Neighbourhood Politics and Housing Opportunities, Centre for Environmental Studies Conference Paper (London: 1975) p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  35. N. Lewis, ‘Council Housing Allocation: Problems of Discretion and Control’, Public Administration, vol. 54 (1976) p. 155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. See the following: M. Harloe (ed.), Captive Cities (London: Wiley, 1977) particularly the Introduction and Chapters 1, 2 and 7

    Google Scholar 

  37. R. Pahl, Whose City? (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1975) Chapter 13

    Google Scholar 

  38. P. Norman, Managerialism: A Review of Recent Work, Centre for Environmental Studies Conference Paper (London: 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  39. See J. English, R. Madigan and P. Norman, Slum Clearance (London: Croom Helm, 1976) pp. 121–2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1979 Norman Ginsburg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ginsburg, N. (1979). Council Housing. In: Class, Capital and Social Policy. Critical Texts in Social Work and the Welfare State. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16169-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics