Conceptualising Non-Capitalist Modes of Production: the Asiatic Mode

  • John G. Taylor

Abstract

In attempting to analyse the structure and reproduction of this particular mode of production, we immediately encounter various theoretical problems. As opposed to his analysis of the capitalist mode of production and his brief formulations on the feudal mode, Marx nowhere constructs the concept of the Asiatic mode in terms of the theory of modes of production he develops in Capital. Difficulties arising from this are also compounded by the fact that comments on the Asiatic mode are scattered throughout his writings, existing at very different times in the development of his discourse; notes on its dominant form of property contained in the German Ideology are tainted with evolutionist notions, the accounts given of British colonial penetration of India and China (which Marx assumed to be examples of this mode of production) in the letters and articles of 1850–81 are extremely limited, and the overall description of the Asiatic mode given in the Grundrisse2 is nothing more than an introduction to its structure, an introduction which should be read from within the theory of modes contained in Capital, but which in itself cannot—as we have seen—assume the status of a fully developed concept. This, then, is the problem: where Marx presents his theory, he makes hardly any mention of the Asiatic mode, since this is clearly not the object of Capital. Yet, in other widely disparate texts whose theoretical adequacy in analysing pre-capitalist modes is, as we have seen, open to question, he does give us descriptions of the functioning of the Asiatic mode.

Keywords

Income Sine Egypt Rium Defend 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    C.E.R.M. Sur le ‘mode de production asiatique’, Editions Sociales, Paris, 1969.Google Scholar
  2. K. Marx and F. Engels, On Colonialism, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1968.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    K. Marx, Grundrisse, Penguin Books, London, 1973, pp. 471–574.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    A. Badiou, Le Concept de modèle, Maspero, Paris, 1970Google Scholar
  5. B. Hindess, ‘Materialist Mathematics’ Theoretical Practice, 3/4, Autumn, 1971.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    K. Wittfogel, Oriental Despotism, Yale University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    K. Polanyi, Dahomey and the Slave Trade, A.E.S. Monograph, No. 42, University of Washington Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    E. T. Aymonier, Histoire de l’ancien Cambodge Paris, 1920Google Scholar
  9. A. Dauphin-Meunier, Histoire de Cambodge, Paris, 1961.Google Scholar
  10. B. P. Groslier, Angkor et la Cambodge au XVI siècle d’après les sources portugaises et espagnoles, Paris, 1968.Google Scholar
  11. A. Migot, Les Khmers, des origines d’Angkor au Cambodge d’aujourd’hui, Paris, 1960.Google Scholar
  12. C. B. Walker, Angkor Empire, Calcutta, 1955.Google Scholar
  13. L. P. Briggs, The Ancient Khmer Empire, Philadelphia, 1951.Google Scholar
  14. 11.
    T. S. Raffles, History of Java, London, 1817.Google Scholar
  15. G. Coèdes, The Indianised States of S.E. Asia, Honolulu, 1968.Google Scholar
  16. R. von Heine-Geldern, Conceptions of State and Kingship in Southeast Asia; Ithaca, N. York, 1963.Google Scholar
  17. T. G. Pigeaud, Java in the Fourteenth Century: A study in Cultural History (5 volumes), The Hague, 1960–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. F. M. Schnitger, Forgotten Kingdoms in Sumatra, E. J. Brill, Leiden, 1939.Google Scholar
  19. O. W. Wolters, Early Indonesian Commerce: A Study of the Origins of Srivijava, Ithaca, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
  20. 12.
    Nguyen Thanh-Nha, Tableau économique du Vietnam aux XVlleet XVIII siècles Éditions Cujas, Paris, 1970.Google Scholar
  21. Jean Chesnaux, Contribution à l’histoire de la nation Vietnamienne Paris, Éditions Sociales, 1955.Google Scholar
  22. Le Thanh Khoi, Le Vietnam: Histoire et civilisation, Paris, Editions de Minuit, 1955.Google Scholar
  23. Joseph Buttinger, The Smaller Dragon, Praeger, New York, 1958.Google Scholar
  24. Nguyen Van Huyen, La Civilisation annamitée Hanoi, 1944.Google Scholar
  25. J. Riche, ‘La Cochinchine au XVIIIe siècle’, Revue d’Europe et des Colonies, Paris 1906.Google Scholar
  26. Vu Quoc Thue, L’économie communaliste du Viet-Nam, ed. De Droit, Paris, 1951.Google Scholar
  27. L. Cadière, Résumé de L’histoire d’Annam, Quihnon, 1911.Google Scholar
  28. G. Gosselin, L’Empire D’Annam, Paris, 1957.Google Scholar
  29. C. B. Maybon, Histoire Moderne du Pays d’Annam (1592–1820), Paris 1920.Google Scholar
  30. C. E. Rouger, Histoire Militaire et Politique et l’Annam et du Tonkin depuis 1799, Paris, 1906.Google Scholar
  31. 14.
    A. V. Chayanov, On the Theory of Peasant Economy, ed. D. Thorner, Irwin, Homewood Ill., 1966.Google Scholar
  32. 27.
    G. Lichtheim, ‘Marx and the Asiatic Mode of Production’, in St. Anthony’s Papers, No. 14, 1963.Google Scholar
  33. 28.
    D. Fernbach Surveys from Exile, Marx’s political writings, Vol. 2, Penguin Books, 1973, p. 24Google Scholar

Copyright information

© John G. Taylor 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • John G. Taylor

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations