Skip to main content

The Effects of Capitalist Penetration of Non-Capitalist Modes of Production: Penetration Under the Dominance of Merchants’ Capital

  • Chapter
From Modernization to Modes of Production
  • 26 Accesses

Abstract

In earlier chapters we noted the role that accumulations of mercantile capital played in the genealogy of the capitalist mode of production, and that the dominance of this form of capital in the period of the dissolution of the feudal mode and the transition to dominance by the capitalist mode had specific economic effects on non-capital modes.1 We also indicated that these effects continue to be reproduced even when merchants’ capital is no longer dominant, when penetration occurs under other forms, as the circulation of mercantile capital is increasingly subjected to the requirements of capitalist production.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 27.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. K. Marx and F. Engels, Selected Correspondence, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1965, pp. 379–82.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Furtado, Economic Development of Latin America, Cambridge University Press, 1970, pp. 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lloyd Best, ‘Outline of a model of a pure plantation economy’, Social and Economic Studies, September 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Beckford, Persistent Poverty, Oxford University Press, London, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Guerrero, Philippine Society and Revolution, Ta Kung Pao, Hong Kong, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. S. Furnivall, Netherlands India: A Study of Plural Economy, Macmillan, New York, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. S. Furnivall, Colonial Policy and Practice: A Comparative Study of Burma and Netherlands India, Cambridge, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Geertz, Agricultural Involution, University of California Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rex Mortimer, ‘Indonesia: Growth or Development?’ in Showcase State: the Illusion of Indonesia’s ‘accelerated modernisation’, ed. Rex Mortimer, Angus and Robertson, London, 1973, pp. 61–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. D. Lublinskaya, French Absolutism: The Crucial Phase 1620–1629, Cambridge University Press, 1968, Ch. 1, pp. 38–75.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Dupré and P. P. Rey, ‘Reflections on the pertinence of a theory of the history of exchange’ in Economy and SocietyVol. 2, No. 2, May 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Terray, ‘Long-distance exchange and the formation of the State’ in Economy and SocietyVol. 3, No. 3, August 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. P. Rey, Colonialisme, néo-colonialisme et transition de capitalisme Maspero, Paris, 1971, Part II, Chapters 3 and 4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1979 John G. Taylor

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taylor, J.G. (1979). The Effects of Capitalist Penetration of Non-Capitalist Modes of Production: Penetration Under the Dominance of Merchants’ Capital. In: From Modernization to Modes of Production. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16156-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics