Abstract
Up to the early 1920s the classical theory of price included two main models, pure competition and monopoly. Duopoly models were considered as intellectual exercises rather than real-world situations. The general model of economic behaviour from Marshall to Knight1 was pure competition. In the late 1920s economists became increasingly dissatisfied with the use of pure competition as an analytical model of business behaviour. It was obvious that pure competition could not explain several empirical facts. The assumption of a homogeneous product, in the theory of competition, did not fit the real world. Furthermore advertising and other selling activities, practices widely used by businessmen, could not be explained by pure competition. Finally, firms expanded their output with falling costs, without however growing infinitely large, as the pure competition model would predict in the event of continuously decreasing costs.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Monopolistic Competition
Abbott, L., Quality and Competition (Columbia University Press, 1955 ).
Andrews, P. W. S., On Competition in Economic Theory (Macmillan, 1964 ).
Archibald, G. C., ‘Chamberlin versus Chicago’, Review of Economic Studies (1961). Reprinted in Readings in the Theory of the Firm, ed. G. C. Archibald (Penguin, 1971 ).
Bain, J. S., ‘Chamberlin’s Impact on Microeconomic Theory’, in Monopolistic Competition Theory: Studies in Impact. Essays in Honour of E. H. Chamberlin, ed. R. E. Kuenne (Wiley, 1966), Reprinted in Readings in Price Theory, ed. H. Townsend (Penguin, 1971 ).
Bishop, R. L., ‘The Theory of Monopolistic Competition after Thirty Years: The Impact on General Theory’, American Economic Review (1964). Reprinted in Readings in Microeconomics, ed. D. R. Kamerschen (Wiley, 1969 ).
Buchanan, N. S., ‘Advertising Expenditures: A Suggested Treatment’, Journal of Political Economy, (1942). Reprinted in Readings in Microeconomics, ed. W. Breit and H. M. Hochman ( Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1967 ).
Chamberlin, E. H., The Theory of Monopolistic Competition (Harvard University Press, 1933 ).
Chamberlin, E. H., ‘Monopolistic Competition Re-examined’, Economica (1951).
Demetz, H., ‘The Nature of Equilibrium in Monopolistic Competition’, Journal of Political Economy (1959).
Demetz, H., ‘The Welfare and Empirical Implications of Monopolistic Competition’, Economic Journal (1964).
Harrod, R. F., ‘Theory of Imperfect Competition Revised’, Economic Essays (Harcourt-Brace, 1952 ).
Hicks, J. R., ‘The Process of Imperfect Competition’, Oxford Economic Papers (1954) pp. 41–54.
Robinson, Joan, The Economics of Imperfect Competition (Macmillan, 1933 ).
Robinson, Joan, ‘Imperfect Competition Revisited’, Economic Journal (1953).
Samuelson, P. A., ‘The Monopolistic Competition Revolution’, in Monopolistic Competition Theory: Studies in Impact. Essays in Honour of E. H. Chamberlin, ed. R. E. Kuenne (Wiley, 1966 ).
Sraffa, P., ‘The Laws of Returns under Competitive Conditions’, Economic Journal (1926). Reprinted in American Economic Association, Readings in Price Theory (1946).
Stigler, G. J., ‘Monopolistic Competition in Retrospect’, in Five Lectures on Economic Problems ( Longmans, Green, 1949 ).
Telser, L. G., ‘Monopolistic Competition: Any Impact Yet?, Journal of Political Economy (1968).
Triffin, R., Monopolistic Competition and General Equilibrium (Harvard University Press, 1939 ).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1979 A. Koutsoyiannis
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koutsoyiannis, A. (1979). Monopolistic Competition. In: Modern Microeconomics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16077-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16077-8_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-25349-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16077-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)