Abstract
The labelling perspective is dead: long live labelling theory. However, this book is a plea for reformulation, not one for resuscitation or rejuvenation. Rather than celebrate or bewail the currently morbid state of affairs, I hope instead to analytically reground the labelling approach. I think this is possible as labelling is vilified not so much because of its analytic inabilities, but rather because it has become an institutional failure. Since institutional failings are easier to correct than analytic ones are to patch up, there is still a chance that the magnificently imaginative scope of the labelling perspective might be refashioned as an intellectually and institutionally competent theory.
A fundamental direction that labelling analysis must take is toward the construction of propositions, which will make it more of a theory and less of an exercise in theorising. At the present time, labelling analysis consists largely of theorising, developing ideas that are not crystallised into theories but serve only to generate more loosely related ideas. (Ericson, 1975, p. 141).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1979 Jason Ditton
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ditton, J. (1979). The Controlological Pedigree. In: Controlology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16071-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16071-6_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-25966-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16071-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)