Abstract
With the breakdown of the economic discussions in Madrid and the failure of attempts to draw North Africa back into the war, most of the momentum had gone out of British policy towards Vichy in the early months of 1941, and a pessimistic appreciation of likely developments in Franco-German relations which Eden submitted to the Cabinet in early February had little to offer in terms of an effective British response.1 Even when the danger of Laval’s return to power had passed, the ascendancy of Darlan removed any hope of a favourable evolution on the part of the Vichy government. Darlan, indeed, was thought to be even more dangerous than Laval, partly because he was the more ‘respectable’ politician and partly because of his feelings of bitter animosity towards the British.2
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
E. L. Woodward, British Foreign Policy in the Second World War-official history, vol. n (1971) p. 61.
R. Melka, ‘Darlan between Britain and Germany, 1940–1941’, 3. of Contemp. Hist., VIII 2 (1973) 68–9.
G. Warner, Iraq and Syria (1974) pp. 101–4.
Weygand, p. 422; R. Aron, The Vichy Regime 1940–1944, trans. H. Hare (1958) p. 316; Melka, pp. 68–70.
P. Pétain, Paroles aux Français: messages et écrits, 191–941 (1941) p. 117.
See J. Carcopino, Souvenirs de sept ans, 1937–1944(1953) pp. 547–9; Aron, pp. 323–34.
O. Abetz, Histoire d’une politique Franco-Allemande, 1930–1950 (1953) pp. 205–6, Melka, pp. 71–2; Paxton, Vichy France, p. 121.
Copyright information
© 1979 R. T. Thomas
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thomas, R.T. (1979). Britain and America’s ‘Vichy Gamble’. In: Britain and Vichy. The Making of 20th Century. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16052-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16052-5_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-24313-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16052-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)