Skip to main content

Concluding Notes: Is It Relevant?

  • Chapter
Monetarists and Keynesians
  • 7 Accesses

Abstract

In the preceding chapter we have tried to show that Keynes’s monetary theory was intimately bound up with his theory of capital and that together they form the basis of an analysis of the causes of fluctuations in output and employment. It is interesting to note that in a recent book [36] Hicks — the founder of IS/LM analysis — comes round to the same conclusion.

I pass to consider the other main parts of the Keynes theory — the marginal efficiency of capital and the theory of money. I shall take them together, for I think I can show that they belong together … [and in a footnote Hicks continues] In my ‘Mr Keynes and the Classics’ Econometrica, 1937, I similarly reduced Keynes’ three relations to two,1 taking the multiplier with the marginal efficiency of capital to form the SI curve. I have come to feel that the alternative grouping, which I am following here, is more revealing’ ([36] p. 31).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1978 Brian Morgan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morgan, B. (1978). Concluding Notes: Is It Relevant?. In: Monetarists and Keynesians. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15963-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics