Skip to main content
  • 14 Accesses

Abstract

A producer’s after-sales responsibilities to consumers relate to (i) the satisfactory working of products; and (ii) liability for any defects or for any consequential loss. The first of these responsibilities may involve specific commitments in any one or all of the following areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Text References

  1. See Euroforum No. 18/76 (4 May 1976), Annex 1, p. 1 reporting on a BEUC survey of after-sales service in EEC countries.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Which? (February 1977), p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alisdair Aird, op. cit., p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Practical Householder (September 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Center for Policy Alternatives, The Productivity and Servicing of Consumer Durable Products op. cit. pp. 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For example, see Which? (February 1977) pp. 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Under the Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1973 attempted exclusions of purchasers’ normal legal rights are void. But it is not illegal (nor uncommon) for a guarantee to contain conditions which might mislead consumers into believing they have lost such rights. In addition, the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 makes ineffective any clause which a firm may use to try and exclude or limit its liability for death or injury caused by its negligence. Also, clauses relating to exclusions for other loss or damage caused through negligence will be effective only if a firm can convince a court that the clause is ‘reasonable’.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Which? (April 1976), p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  9. This is the definition of `functional literacy’ used by UNESCO. See Legal Action Group Bulletin (February 1977), p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  10. University of Texas at Austin, Division of Extension, Dr. W. E. Barron, Dean. Adult Functional Competency: A Summary, March 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  11. This is disturbing, because some of the data in this Table really need to be explained. For instance, miniaturised Hi-Fi, photographic and film equipment has not been available for 50 years—which is said to be the actual time they have been used in under-developed countries.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Subject/search headings: reliability, durability, servicing, spares, obsolescence, life-cycle costs, repair, warranty, guarantee, product liability etc.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bureau Européen des Union Des Consommateurs/European Bureau of Consumers’ Unions, After-Sales Service in the European Community (Brussels: BEUC, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Center for Policy Alternatives, Consumer Appliances; the Real Cost (Springfield, Va.: U.S. National Technical Information Service, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Center for Policy Alternatives, Consumer Durables: Warranties, Service Contracts and Alternatives (Springfield, Va.: U.S. National Technical Information Service, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Logistics Management Institute, Life-Cycle Costs: Procurement Cases (for example, for gas, electric ranges, water heaters, air conditioners, etc.); (Washington DC: U.S. National Bureau of Standards, 1975–7).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Electrical and Television Retailers Association, Tour Electrical and Electronic Products: A Guide to Their Life Servicing and Repair (London: ETRA, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Consumer Protection Advisory Committee, Rights of Consumers: A Report on Practices Relating to the Purported Exclusion of Inalienable Rights of Consumers and Failure to Explain their Existence (London: HMSO, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Directorate-General for Internal Market, EEC, Memorandum on the Approximation of the Laws of Member States relating to Product Liability (Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, 1974) Ref. Working Document No. X1/332/74-E.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Council of Europe, Draft European Convention on Products Liability (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 1976). Ref. No. DIR/Jur (76) 5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Consumers’ Association, Product Liability (London: Consumers’ Association (memorandum), 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. J. Miller and P. A. Lovell, Product Liability (London: Butterworths, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1978 Charles Medawar

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Medawar, C. (1978). After Sales. In: The Social Audit Consumer Handbook. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15908-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics