Advertisement

Citizens and the Elections

  • Valentine Herman
  • Juliet Lodge

Abstract

The extension of the franchise to.EC publics will not necessarily by itself augment the representativeness and legitimacy of the European Parliament. It will, however, represent a step towards increasing the element of democracy in the Community. It will also ensure that citizens are represented in the Parliament by those whom they have elected. By contrast, the extent to which the representativeness of the Parliament is increased will depend on the electoral systems adopted by the member states for, and on the level of turn-out at, the European elections. If turn-out were low, it could be argued that the directly elected Parliament were hardly more representative than its predecessor and that, therefore, its claims to greater decision-making powers were no more legitimate. From this it is apparent that the European Parliament has a particular interest in stimulating high turn-out. To do this, however, it must perform a number of parliamentary functions it has thus far inadequately fulfilled. These functions are ones normally associated with parliamentary fora in the member states. According to Zellentin:

If one were to base an analysis of the European Parliament on a somewhat simplified form of Bagehot’s classic definition of the functions of a parliament, one would find the following similarities and differences.The elective function (with regard to the executive) is lacking: the European Parliament is not an electoral chamber. The expressive function (‘to express the mind of the … people on all matters which come before it’) would be more effective if there were direct elections. This is also true of the teaching function (‘a great and open council of considerable men cannot be placed in the middle of a society without altering that society’). The informing function is zealously carried on by the European Parliament in order to familiarise the public with the administrative discussions and measures on integration. But it takes part in the legislative function only consulta?tively. As regards Bagehot’s sixth function, namely the financial one, the European Parliament must be consulted during the preparation of the budget, but it is the Council … which has the last word in this matter. Finally, a seventh function should be added, pace Bagehot, which is most important for all developing parliaments of the conti?nental type, namely the control of the executive. For this particular purpose, the motion of censure is in theory the strongest instrument in the European Parliament).1

Keywords

Member State Linguistic Diversity Political Group National Party Direct Election 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    G. Zellentin, ‘Forms and Function of the Opposition in the European Communities’, Government and Opposition, II (1967) 416–35, at p. 418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. N. Rosenau, Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy (New York: Free Press, 1967) p. 414.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    C. Mueller, The Politics of Communication (New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1973) p. 18.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    D. Nimmo, Popular Images of Politics, (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974).Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    G. Granai, ‘Communication, Language et Société’. Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie, XXIII (1957) 57–110, cited ibid.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    See F. I. Greenstein, Children and Politics (New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1965);Google Scholar
  7. R. E. Dawson and K. Prewitt, Political Socialisation (Boston: Little, Brown, 1969);Google Scholar
  8. D. Easton and J. Dennis, Children in the Political System (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969).Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    H. van Dalen and L. H. Zeigler, Introduction to Political Science: People, Politics and Perceptions (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1977) p. 180.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    Mueller, The Politics of Communication, pp. 70–71; G. A. Almond and J. S. Coleman (eds.), The Politics of the Developing Areas (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1960) p. 17.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    R. Dahrendorf, ‘The Foreign Policy of the EEC’, The World Today, XXIX (1973) 47–57.Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    M. Stewart, ‘Direct Elections to the European Parliament’, Common Market Law Review, XIII (1976) 283–301.Google Scholar
  13. 15.
    At six-monthly intervals Eurobarometer reports on ‘public opinion concerning the Community, its institutions, their performance and general questions of interest to the public at large. The surveys are made by specialised institutions using strictly harmonised methods and interviewing about 9000 people (throughout the EC) aged 15 or over.’ J. J. Rabier, ’European Surveys and Social Research’, European Journal of Political Research, V (1977) 103–114, at p. 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. See also R. Inglehart, ‘Changing Value Priorities and European Integration’, Journal of Common Market Studies, X (1971) 1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. R. Inglehart, ‘Public Opinion and Regional Integration’, International Organisation, XXIV (1970) 764–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 20.
    See N. H. Nie and S. Verba, ‘Political Participation’, in F. I. Greenstein and N. W. Polsby (eds.), Handbook of Political Science, vol. IV (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1975).Google Scholar
  17. See also S. H. Barnes, ‘Participation, Education and Political Competence’, American Political Science Review, LX (1966) 348–53Google Scholar
  18. A. Kornberg et al., ‘Legislatures and the Modernisation of Societies’, Comparative Political Studies, V (1973) 471–91.Google Scholar
  19. 21.
    R. S. Byars, ‘Small Group Theory and Shifting Styles of Political Leadership’, Comparative Political Studies, V (1973) 451.Google Scholar
  20. 23.
    B. Hedges and R. Jowell, Britain and the EEC: Report on a Survey of Attitudes Towards the European Economic Community (London, Social and Community Planning Research, 1971)Google Scholar
  21. J. J. Rabier, L’Europe vue par les Européens (Brussels, EC Commission, 1974).Google Scholar
  22. 24.
    J. Lodge, ‘Towards a Human Union: EEC Social Policy and European Integration’, British Journal of International Studies, IV (1978) 47–74.Google Scholar
  23. 25.
    See on this S. Verba and N. H. Nie, Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality (New York: Harper & Row, 1972)Google Scholar
  24. A. Campbell, ‘The Passive Citizen’, Acta Sociologica, VI (1962) 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 27.
    See on linguistic diversity G. Smith, Politics in Western Europe (London: Heinemann, 1972) chap. 1.Google Scholar
  26. 28.
    See J. Fitzmaurice, The Party Groups in the European Parliament (Farnborough: Saxon House, 1975) pp. 163–74.Google Scholar
  27. 41.
    See Stewart, op. cit. The importance of the second set of elections is stressed by J. D. B. Mitchell, ‘The Tindemans Report: Retrospect and Prospect’, Common Market Law Review, XIII (1976) 455–84.Google Scholar
  28. 42.
    The role of leaders and charisma in integration is well documented. See L. N. Lindberg and S. A. Scheingold, Regional Integration: Theory and Research (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1971)Google Scholar
  29. C. Ake, A Theory of Political Integration (Homewood: Dorsey, 1967).Google Scholar
  30. 43.
    See, for example, J. C. Wahlke et al., The Legislative System: Explorations in Legislative Behaviour (New York: Wiley, 1962) chap. 13.Google Scholar
  31. 44.
    R. J. Shepherd, Public Opinion and European Integration (Farnborough: Saxon House, 1975) chap. 9.Google Scholar
  32. 45.
    A. Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper & Row, 1957).Google Scholar
  33. 46.
    L. Festinger, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (New York: Harper & Row, 1957).Google Scholar
  34. 48.
    W. N. Hogan, Representative Government and European Integration (Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press, 1967) p. 95.Google Scholar
  35. 50.
    W. Averyt, ‘Europroups, Clientèla and the European Community’, international Organisation, XXIX (1975) 949–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Valentine Herman and Juliet Lodge 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valentine Herman
    • 1
  • Juliet Lodge
    • 2
  1. 1.Erasmus UniversityRotterdamNetherlands
  2. 2.University of HullUK

Personalised recommendations