Skip to main content

Abstract

Why have direct elections to the European Parliament? The answers to this question have raised anxiety among member governments of the European Community (EC) for it has been recognised that direct elections hold the key to the future of the EC. They have been seen as confirming and defining the existence, nature and political form of the Community — as resolving its ontological problems in favour of federalism. The elections would thus undermine any illusions that the Community was (and would remain) an apolitical, functionally specific international organisation, inspired by functionalist premises, and devoid of political import or implications for the exercise of power by the component member states’ governments.1

A consequence of the Parliament’s new authority will be an increase in its powers, which will take place gradually in the course of the progressive development of the European Union, notably through a growing exercise of the legislative function. It goes without saying that the Parliament should assume an important responsibility in the construction of the Union.

Tindemans Report (1976) p. 29

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Directorate-General for Research and Documentation, Elections to the European Parliament by Direct Universal Suffrage (Luxembourg: European Parliament, 1977) p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Directorate-General for Parliamentary Documentation and Information, The Case for Elections to the European Parliament by Direct Universal Suffrage (Luxembourg: European Parliament, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  3. For details see W. Clark, The Politics of the Common Market (Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1967) p. 81

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Lodge, ‘The Reform of the European Parliament’, Political Science, XXV (1973) 63–66.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dr Hallstein (then President of the Commission) indicated as much in 1963. See M. Forsyth, The Parliament of the European Communities (London: PEP, 1964) p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. von Lindeiner-Wildau, La Supranationalité en tant que Principe de Droit (Leiden: Sijthoff, 1970) pp. 137ff.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Cardis, Fédéralisme et Intégration Européenne (Lausanne: Centre de Recherches Européennes, 1964) pp. 42–56, 190–4, 225–31.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See D. Mitrany, The Functional Theory of Politics (London: Martin Robertson, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. See M. Steed, ‘The European Parliament: The Significance of Direct Election’, Government and Opposition, VI (1971) 462–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Lodge, ‘Loyalty and the EEC: The Limitations of the Functionalist Approach’, Political Studies, XXVI (1978) (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1978 Valentine Herman and Juliet Lodge

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herman, V., Lodge, J. (1978). Introduction. In: The European Parliament and the European Community. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15892-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics