Abstract
Why have direct elections to the European Parliament? The answers to this question have raised anxiety among member governments of the European Community (EC) for it has been recognised that direct elections hold the key to the future of the EC. They have been seen as confirming and defining the existence, nature and political form of the Community — as resolving its ontological problems in favour of federalism. The elections would thus undermine any illusions that the Community was (and would remain) an apolitical, functionally specific international organisation, inspired by functionalist premises, and devoid of political import or implications for the exercise of power by the component member states’ governments.1
A consequence of the Parliament’s new authority will be an increase in its powers, which will take place gradually in the course of the progressive development of the European Union, notably through a growing exercise of the legislative function. It goes without saying that the Parliament should assume an important responsibility in the construction of the Union.
Tindemans Report (1976) p. 29
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Directorate-General for Research and Documentation, Elections to the European Parliament by Direct Universal Suffrage (Luxembourg: European Parliament, 1977) p. 5.
Directorate-General for Parliamentary Documentation and Information, The Case for Elections to the European Parliament by Direct Universal Suffrage (Luxembourg: European Parliament, 1969).
For details see W. Clark, The Politics of the Common Market (Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1967) p. 81
J. Lodge, ‘The Reform of the European Parliament’, Political Science, XXV (1973) 63–66.
Dr Hallstein (then President of the Commission) indicated as much in 1963. See M. Forsyth, The Parliament of the European Communities (London: PEP, 1964) p. 88.
K. von Lindeiner-Wildau, La Supranationalité en tant que Principe de Droit (Leiden: Sijthoff, 1970) pp. 137ff.
F. Cardis, Fédéralisme et Intégration Européenne (Lausanne: Centre de Recherches Européennes, 1964) pp. 42–56, 190–4, 225–31.
See D. Mitrany, The Functional Theory of Politics (London: Martin Robertson, 1975).
See M. Steed, ‘The European Parliament: The Significance of Direct Election’, Government and Opposition, VI (1971) 462–76.
J. Lodge, ‘Loyalty and the EEC: The Limitations of the Functionalist Approach’, Political Studies, XXVI (1978) (forthcoming).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1978 Valentine Herman and Juliet Lodge
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Herman, V., Lodge, J. (1978). Introduction. In: The European Parliament and the European Community. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15892-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15892-8_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-23982-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15892-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)