Skip to main content

The Planning Wage

  • Chapter
Growth and Development
  • 29 Accesses

Abstract

The two extreme views on the valuation of labour in surplus-labour economies have already been touched on previously. On the one hand there is the ‘traditional’ view that if the marginal product of labour in agriculture is zero, labour ought to be considered ‘costless’ in the planning process in order for current total output to be maximised (see Chapter 3). This is also the programming solution where the objective function is to maximise current income subject to resource constraints, but where labour is not a scarce resource and capital- and consumption-goods prices are not adjusted to reflect the social valuation of them (see Chapter 10). On the other hand, there is the opposite ‘modern’ view that if the wage in industry is higher than the wage in agriculture, and the propensity to consume is unity, labour transference will involve an increase in consumption, so that to maximise growth and output in the future labour ought to be valued at the industrial wage to maximise the investible surplus (see Chapter 3).

This chapter is a revised and condensed version of my paper ‘The Valuation of Labour in Surplus Labour Economies: A Synoptic View’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy (Nov 1971).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Further Reading

  • H. Bruton, ‘The Two Gap Approach to Aid and Development: Comment’, American Economic Review (June 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Dasgupta, S. Marglin and A. Sen, Guidelines for Project Evaluation (New York: United Nations, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Kennedy, ‘Restraints and the Allocation of Resources’, Oxford Economic Papers (July 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Lefeber, ‘Planning in a Surplus Labor Economy’, American Economic Review (June 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • I. M. D. Little, ‘The Real Cost of Labour and the Choice between Consumption and Investment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics (Feb 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • — and J. Mirrlees, Manual of Industrial Project Analysis in Developing Countries, vol. II: Social Cost-Benefit Analysis (Paris: O.E.C.D., 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Meier, ‘Development without Employment’, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review (Sep 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. K. Sen, Choice of Techniques, 3rd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. P. Thirlwall, ‘An Extension of Sen’s Model of the Valuation of Labour in Surplus Labour Economies’, Pakistan Development Review (Autumn 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, ‘The Valuation of Labour in Surplus Labour Economies: A Synoptic View’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy (Nov 1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1978 A. P. Thirlwall

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thirlwall, A.P. (1978). The Planning Wage. In: Growth and Development. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15875-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics