Skip to main content

The Demand for Money as a Medium of Exchange

  • Chapter
  • 28 Accesses

Abstract

The fundamental question for monetary theory is why do people hold money which is barren rather than interest bearing securities or ‘productive’ physical goods? The answer must involve uncertainty!

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. R. F. Harrod, ‘Themes in Dynamic Theory’, Economic Journal, 73 (1963) p 442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Hansen, Monetary Theory and Fiscal Policy (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1949) p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. M. Keynes, ‘Alternative Theories of the Rate of Interest’, Economic Journal (1937) 47, pp. 241–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cf. J. Robinson, The Rate of Interest and Other Essays (London: Macmillan, 1952) pp. 20–2.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. M. Keynes, ‘The Ex-Ante Theory of the Rate of Interest’, Econ. Jour. 47 (1937) p. 667.

    Google Scholar 

  6. As we will show below, it was this aspect that led D. H. Robertson to utter the triumphal note that Keynes had at last restored productivity ‘to something like its rightful place in governing the rate of interest from the side of demand’. See D. H. Robertson, ‘Mr. Keynes and “Finance”’, Economic Journal, 48 (1938) p. 317.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Friedman, ‘The Demand for Money: Some Theoretical and Empirical Results’, Journ. Pol. Econ. 67 (1959) pp. 328–38. Permanent incomes and prices represent expectational levels which, it is assumed, will be realised since there is no uncertainty in Friedman’s model.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. R. Hicks, ‘Mr. Keynes and the “Classics”: A Suggested Interpretation’, Econometrica, 5 (1937) pp. 147–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Keynes, ‘The Ex-Ante Theory of the Rate of Interest’, Econ. Jour. 47 (1937) p. 669.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. H. Robertson, Essays on Monetary Theory (London: Staples, 1940) pp. 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. G. Gurley and E. S. Shaw, Money in a Theory of Finance (Washington: Brookings, 1960) p. 228.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. M. Keynes, ‘The Ex-Ante Theory of the Rate of Interest’, Econ. Journ. 47 (1937) p. 668.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. M. Keynes, ‘The Ex-Ante Theory of the Rate of Interest’, Econ. Jour., 47 (1937) pp. 668–9. Italics added.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. M. Keynes, ‘Alternative Theories of the Rate of Interest’, Econ. Journ. 47 (1937) p. 248. Italics added. Of course, if there was some queueing initially (before the increase in the demand for finance), then the length of the queue will increase as planned transactions rise as a result of entrepreneurs attempting to finance more investment projects than before.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1978 Paul Davidson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davidson, P. (1978). The Demand for Money as a Medium of Exchange. In: Money and the Real World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15865-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics