Abstract
Defining countries as different as Russia and China, Egypt and Iran, as ‘bureaucratic collectivisms’ might raise doubts in readers unfamiliar with Marxist methodology. But to say that they are all collective bureaucracies is not to lump them together under the same head. There are considerable differences between societies founded on other modes of production too. Classical Greece and ancient Rome were both founded on slavery; tenth-century France and Tokugawa Japan were both feudal States; and monarchist, liberal England, social-democratic Sweden and Nazi Germany were all based on capitalism. So too there are fundamental differences between collective bureaucracies. To prevent misunderstandings we should therefore single out a few of the basic typical features of such societies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
Quoted in Lin Piao, Report to the 19th National Party Congress of the Chinese Communist Party, Foreign Language Publishing House, Peking, 1969, pp. 62–3.
Copyright information
© 1977 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Melotti, U. (1977). Typologies of Bureaucratic Collectivisms. In: Marx and the Third World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15801-0_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15801-0_24
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-19817-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15801-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)