Skip to main content

Typologies of Bureaucratic Collectivisms

  • Chapter
Marx and the Third World
  • 51 Accesses

Abstract

Defining countries as different as Russia and China, Egypt and Iran, as ‘bureaucratic collectivisms’ might raise doubts in readers unfamiliar with Marxist methodology. But to say that they are all collective bureaucracies is not to lump them together under the same head. There are considerable differences between societies founded on other modes of production too. Classical Greece and ancient Rome were both founded on slavery; tenth-century France and Tokugawa Japan were both feudal States; and monarchist, liberal England, social-democratic Sweden and Nazi Germany were all based on capitalism. So too there are fundamental differences between collective bureaucracies. To prevent misunderstandings we should therefore single out a few of the basic typical features of such societies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Quoted in Lin Piao, Report to the 19th National Party Congress of the Chinese Communist Party, Foreign Language Publishing House, Peking, 1969, pp. 62–3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1977 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Melotti, U. (1977). Typologies of Bureaucratic Collectivisms. In: Marx and the Third World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15801-0_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics