Skip to main content

Town Planning

  • Chapter
Why the Poor Pay More

Abstract

The planning system affects us all in one way or another — through location of homes and jobs, through roadbuilding, through redevelopment of city centres. slum areas and so on. So it is important to know whether there is any bias in the system against poorer people, and if so what it is and how it can be corrected. David Lock argues that the planning system is capable of delivering great benefits to all consumers but that certain methods and practices of planners, combined with the inability of poorer consumers to insist on their rights, have been major obstacles in getting poorer people a fair deal

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Royal Town Planning Institute, Memorandum of observations submitted to the Royal Commission on the Distribution of Income and Wealth, London, RTPI, June 1976

    Google Scholar 

  2. Radical Institute Group, The distributional consequences of town planning. August 1976

    Google Scholar 

  3. Royal Town Planning Institute, Planning and the future. London, RTPI, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  4. C B Purdom, The Letchworth achievement. London, J M Dent, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  5. D Senior, ‘Land policy in reverse’, Public Service. May 1977

    Google Scholar 

  6. D Lock, ‘Planned dispersal and the decline of London’ The Planner. November 1976

    Google Scholar 

  7. Department of the Environment (SPR), Digest of English new town statistics. London, DoE, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  8. See the recommendations of the House of Commons Expenditure Committee (Environment Subcommittee), Second report: new towns. London, HMSO, 1974; also the widely reported criticisms of the social structure of new towns aired during the government-sponsored debate on inner city problems in 1976 and 1977

    Google Scholar 

  9. Comments of Milton Keynes, Peterborough and Northampton New Town Development Corporations on the summary of the Lambeth Inner Area Study consultants’ report. Milton Keynes, MKDC, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  10. P Blake (ed), ‘Britain’s new towns: facts and figures’, Town and Country Planning. February 1977

    Google Scholar 

  11. Town and Country Banning Association, ‘Inner cities of tomorrow’, Town and Country Planning. May 1977

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shankland Cox with Institute of Community Studies, People, Housing and District IAS/LA/5 and Housing stress IAS/LA/6. London, Department of the Environment, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shankland Cox with Institute of Community Studies, Labour market study IAS/LA/4 and London’s inner area: problems and possibilities IAS/LA/11. London, Department of the Environment, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  14. The consultants, Inner area studies: Liverpool, Birmingham and Lambeth, London, HMSO, 1977; also Report of the Committee on Housing in Greater London. London, HMSO, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  15. M Young and P Willmott, The symmetrical family. London, Penguin, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  16. P J O Self, Econocrats and the policy process: the politics and philosophy of cost-benefit analysis. London, Macmillan, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  17. J Grove, ‘The town planner as a community development officer’. Proceedings of the Town and Country Planning School 1975. London, RTPI, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scottish Development Department, National planning guidelines for large industrial sites and rural conservation. Edinburgh, SDD, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  19. A Coleman, ‘Land use planning: success or failure?’, Architects Journal. 19 January 1977

    Google Scholar 

  20. R Cowan, ‘Demons of the fog’, Town and Country Planning. May 1977

    Google Scholar 

  21. D Lock, ‘Structure plans: beware of false promises’, Town and Country Planning. July/August 1975

    Google Scholar 

  22. L Bridges, ‘Structure plan examinations in public’, Town and Country Planning. April 1977

    Google Scholar 

  23. R Hargreaves, ‘An experimental industrial GIA’, Town and Country Planning. January 1976

    Google Scholar 

  24. Planning Aid Service, How to make representations on a planning proposal. London, Town and Country Planning Association, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  25. D Lock and R Cowan, ‘Four years on: the work of the Planning Aid Service’, Town and Country Planning. April 1977

    Google Scholar 

  26. Secretary of State for the Environment, Review of the development control system; final report by Mr George Dobry QC: statement. London, HMSO, 1975

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1977 National Consumer Council

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lock, D. (1977). Town Planning. In: Williams, F. (eds) Why the Poor Pay More. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15779-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics