Skip to main content

Theory, Practice and Policy Imperatives

  • Chapter
Capital Versus the Regions
  • 13 Accesses

Abstract

The previous argument has illustrated the divorce between theory and practice in most of what passes as regional economics. There are considerable differences between regional theory in Western Europe and North America. In Europe, mainly under the influence of Myrdal and Perroux, most specialists in regional economics give considerable weight to imbalance theory. They emphasise the extent to which the free working of the market mechanism in capitalist economies can aggravate the regional problem. In the United States the scale of the urban crisis in a predominantly urbanised society has forced some reappraisal of the interrelation between urban and regional problems. This emerges in the previously cited submissions to government commissions on rural poverty and urban crisis. But with relatively few exceptions regional and location theory in the United States is still hidebound by assumptions of self-balance through the free working of the market. Such neo-classical theory still postulates conditions for harmonious adjustment between regions, and fails to help policy-makers precisely because it is so unrelated to the structure and distribution of activity in modern capitalist economies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. C. Ingram, ‘State and Regional Payments Mechanisms’, Quarterly Journal of Economics (1959) pp. 619–32.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paolo Sylos-Labini, ‘Reflections on the Process of Growth of Southern Italy’, in Essays on Planning and Economic Development ( Centre of Research on Underdeveloped Countries, Warsaw 1965 ) pp. 9–37.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kain and Persky, in Rural Poverty in the United States, p. 303.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cf. Pierre Gabert, ‘La localizzazione della Popolazione Industriale nella Città di Torino e i Problemi dei Transporti Urban’, section 4 (La Tendenza dei lavoratori a raggruparsi nel dintorni delle aziende), in Le Grande Città Italiane, ed. Roberto Mainairdi, pp. 104ff.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cf. Francesco Forte, La Congiuntura in Italia 1961–1965 (Einaudi, 1966 ).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cf. Informazioni SVIMEZ, Nota statistica, ‘Le Migrazione Interne: Causa la Congiuntura Sfavorevole si Attenua il Processo di Meridionalizzazione nel Nord’, no. 6–8 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  8. SVIMEZ-FORMEZ, L’Azienda e il Processo Economico-Sociale, cyclo-styled (1963) pp. 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Francesco Compagna, ‘L’Emigrazione Interna Italiana e il Mercato Europeo del Lavoro’, in SVIMEZ-FORMEZ, Le Migrazione Interne (1964) p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See inter alia S. A. Marglin, ‘Objectives of Water Resource Development’, in Design of Water Resource System, ed. A. Maas et al. (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Moore and J. Rhodes ‘Evaluating the Effects of British Regional Economic Policy’, Economic Journal (March 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Moore and J. Rhodes. ‘Economic and Exchequer Implications of Regional Policy’, Memorandum to the Trade and Industry Sub-Committee of the Commons Expenditure Committee(H.M.S.O., May 1973 ).

    Google Scholar 

  13. See further, Stuart Holland (ed.), The State as Enterpreneur (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1972 )

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stuart Holland (ed.), The Socialist Challenge (London: Quartet Books, 1975). For Labour policy see Labour’s Programme 1973, The Labour Party (London, 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Department of Industry, The Regeneration of British Industry, Cmnd. 5710 ( H.M.S.O., August 1974 ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. See further, Stuart Holland, European Para-Governmental Agencies, in Expenditure Committee (Trade and Industry Sub-Committee) Session 1971–2, Public Money in the Private Sector.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bain, International Differences in Industrial Structure, p. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kuklinski, Location of Industrial Plant, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cameron and Clark found that more than 25 per cent of the companies which they investigated undertook some form of locational-cost analysis, but added that ‘it is not possible for us to state explicitly that these comparative cost surveys were fully comprehensive or analytically correct… We have not discovered any companies which evaluated all cost and non-cost factors in a way which gave particular weights to each item.’ Cameron and Clark, University of Glasgow, Occasional Paper, no. 5 (1966) p. 118. It could be added that these were companies which were obliged to relocate through government refusal to grant I.D.C.s for expansion outside Development Areas.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hirschman, Strategy of Economic Development, pp. 184–5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alain Bienaymé, Politique de l’innovation et distribution des revenus (1966) p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kuklinski, Location of Industrial Plant, p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vernon, Quarterly Journal of Economics (May 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cameron and Clark, University of Glasgow, Occasional Paper, no. 5 (1966) p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid. pp. 30–1.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sarah Orr, ‘Regional Economic Planning and the Location of Industry’, in Regional and Urban Studies —A Social Science Approach, ed. Orr and Cullingworth (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. E. Holmans, ‘Restriction of Industrial Expansion in South-East England: A Reappraisal’, Oxford Economic Papers (July 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cameron and Clark, University of Glasgow, Occasional Paper, no. 5 (1966) p. 68. Town and Country Planning (Mardi 1964) p. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. E. Holmans, Urban Studies (November 1964) pp. 143–4

    Google Scholar 

  30. E. Hammond, Town and Country Planning (March 1964) p. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cameron and Clark, University of Glasgow, Occasional Paper, no. 5 (1966) p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cf. Franco Simoncini’s observation that ‘in theory these problems require a long preliminary work of research and elaboration. In practice the problems of disequilibrium, of polarisation, of concentrated growth do not wait.’ In ‘Economia Regionale e Programmazione’, Scritti in Memoria di Alessandro Molinari (SVIMEZ, 1963 ) p. 624.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cf. Paul Streeten, ‘Unbalanced Growth — Programmes and Prognoses and the Ideal Plant’, Banco Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review (June 1964).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1976 Stuart Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holland, S. (1976). Theory, Practice and Policy Imperatives. In: Capital Versus the Regions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15773-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics