Skip to main content

The Place of Knowledge in Social Work

  • Chapter
The Nature of Social Work
  • 33 Accesses

Abstract

Social work is an ‘applied discipline’ in the sense that relevant knowledge acquired is for direct use in the pursuit of its objectives. The application of knowledge is, however, obviously far from being a mechanistic or simple process. As Stevenson reminds us,1 knowledge is not synonymous with understanding or truth. The definition of wisdom by Socrates as ‘knowledge of what it is one does not know’ is echoed in modern times by Popper’s assertion that our ignorance grows with our knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. O. Stevenson, ‘Knowledge for Social Work’, British Journal of Social Work, vol. 1, no. 2 (Summer 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Magee, Popper (London: Fontana, 1973) p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Emmett, Rules, Roles and Relations (London: Macmillan, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Warnock, The Object of Morality.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Downie and Telfer, Respect for Persons.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell, Moral Dilemmas in Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. H. Waddington, The Scientific Attitude (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1941).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid. p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Magee, Popper, p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Emmett, ‘Ethics and the Social Worker’, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stevenson, ‘Knowledge for Social Work’, p. 225.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Quoted by Bone in S. Arieti (ed.), American Handbook of Psychiatry (New York: Basic Books, 1959) p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quoted in C. R. Rogers, ‘Toward a Science of the Person’, in Behaviourism and Phenomenology, ed. T. W. Wann (University of Chicago Press, 1964) p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stevenson, ‘Knowledge for Social Work’, p. 226.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bartlett, The Common Base of Social Work Practice, p. 223.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goldstein, ‘A Unitary Approach: Its Rationale and Structure’, p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. H. Gombrich, The Tradition of General Knowledge (London School of Economics, 1962) p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bartlett, The Common Base of Social Work Practice.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid. p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Quoted in N. Timms, Casework in the Child Care Service (London: Butterworths, 1962) p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  21. N. Timms, The Language of Social Casework (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968) pp. 27–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid. pp. 28, 29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. V. Donnison, The Development of Social Administration: An Inaugural Lecture (London: Bell & Sons, 1962) pp. 20–1.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid. p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Emmett, Ethics and the Social Worker, p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  26. E. M. Goldberg, Helping the Aged (London: Allen & Unwin, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  27. E. M. Goldberg and J. E. Neil, Social Work in General Practice (London: Allen & Unwin, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bartlett, The Common Base of Social Work Practice.

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Davies, ‘The Current Status of Social Work Research’, British Journal of Social Work, vol. 4, no. 3 (Autumn 1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1976 Zofia T. Butrym

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Butrym, Z.T. (1976). The Place of Knowledge in Social Work. In: The Nature of Social Work. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15685-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics