Skip to main content

Stratification and Welfare

  • Chapter
Social Policy and Citizenship
  • 12 Accesses

Abstract

The simplest forms of government intervention to tackle poverty are directed at avoiding hunger and disease. In the advanced industrial countries with which studies of social policy and administration are generally concerned, however, poverty has a special meaning. It is not the poverty of the undeveloped agricultural countries where the majority of the population is engaged in a constant struggle for survival, where malnutrition and disease are widespread, where medical and welfare services are grossly inadequate and where, in any case, economic development may claim a major share of national resources. It is rather a matter of distribution; of poverty which arises through inequality. If wealth were more evenly spread poverty could be eliminated. In the United States in 1969, for instance, 13 per cent of the total population were living below the adequacy level and it would have cost $9 billion to raise them out of poverty,1 but since the last war the G.N.P. in the United States has increased on average by $16 billion annually (at 1966 prices) — a growth rate of roughly 2 per cent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Peter Townsend (ed.), The Concept of Poverty (Heinemann, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wilfred Beckerman, International Comparisons of Real Income (O.E.C.D., 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  3. International Labour Office, The Cost of Social Security 1964–66 (Geneva, 1972) part 2, comparative tables.

    Google Scholar 

  4. United Nations, Demographic Year Book 1971 (New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  5. United Nations, Demographic Year Book 1972 (New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. E. Meade, Efficiency, Equality and the Ownership of Property (Allen & Unwin, 1964) p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For discussion of American experience in a variety of community-development experiments, see Peter Marris and Martin Rein, Dilemmas of Social Reform (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967);

    Google Scholar 

  8. Daniel P. Moynihan, Maximum Feasible Misunderstanding (Free Press, 1969);

    Google Scholar 

  9. and James L. Sundquist (ed.), On Fighting Poverty (Basic Books, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Otis Dudley Duncan, ‘Inheritance of Poverty or Inheritance of Race?’, in On Understanding Poverty, ed. Daniel P. Moynihan (Basic Books, 1968) p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Juliet Cheetham, ‘Race and Immigration’, in Trends in British Society since 1900, ed. A. H. Halsey (Macmillan, 1972) table 14.5. The apparently favourable position of the Indian immigrants is explained by their tendency to establish themselves as small-scale entrepreneurs — often shop or restaurant owners.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. W. Daniel, Racial Discrimination in England (Penguin, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E J. B. Rose et al., Colour and Citizenship (Oxford University Press, 1969) p. 443.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. H. Tawney, Equality (Allen & Unwin, 1964) p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barbara Wootton, The Social Foundations of Wages Policy (Allen & Unwin, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. H. Marshall, Citizenship and Social Class, and Other Essays (Cambridge University Press, 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  17. See W. G. Runciman, Relative Deprivation and Social Justice (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966) for an analysis of the nature and significance of class, status and equality in Britain since the war.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See, for instance, R. M. Titmuss, Income Distribution and Social Change (Allen & Unwin, 1962);

    Google Scholar 

  19. Adrian L. Webb and Jack E. B. Sieve, Income Redistribution and the Welfare State (Bell, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Murray Forsyth, Property and Property Distribution Policy (P.E.P., 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  21. See A. B. Atkinson, Unequal Shares (Allen Lane, The Penguin Press, 1972) for a study of the distribution of wealth in Britain and proposals for making it more equal.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Michael Stewart, ‘The Distribution of Income’, in The Labour Government’s Economic Record 1964–1970, ed. Wilfred Beckerman (Duckworth, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. L. Nicholson, Redistribution of Income in the United Kingdom (Bowes & Bowes, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  24. United Nations, Incomes in Post-War Europe: A Study of Policies, Growth, and Distribution (Geneva, 1967) chap. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Anthony Christopher, George Polyani, Arthur Seldon and Barbara Shenfield, Policy for Poverty (Institute of Economic Affairs, 1970) p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gabriel Kolko, Wealth and Power in America (Praeger, 1962) p. 390.

    Google Scholar 

  27. V. N. George, Social Security — Beveridge and After (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968) p. 24;

    Google Scholar 

  28. Frank Field, One Nation: ‘The Conservatives’ Record since June 1970, C.P.A.G. Poverty Pamphlet 12 (September 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  29. See R. M. Titmuss, Commitment to Welfare (Allen & Unwin, 1968) part III, for a discussion of the problem of how to concentrate services on those who most need them without at the same time imposing the stigma of social inferiority.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See, for example, Adela Adam Nevitt, Housing, Taxation and Subsidies (Nelson, 1966) chap. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  31. John Vaizey, The Cost of Education (Allen & Unwin, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1975 Julia Parker

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parker, J. (1975). Stratification and Welfare. In: Social Policy and Citizenship. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15583-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics