Abstract
The simplest forms of government intervention to tackle poverty are directed at avoiding hunger and disease. In the advanced industrial countries with which studies of social policy and administration are generally concerned, however, poverty has a special meaning. It is not the poverty of the undeveloped agricultural countries where the majority of the population is engaged in a constant struggle for survival, where malnutrition and disease are widespread, where medical and welfare services are grossly inadequate and where, in any case, economic development may claim a major share of national resources. It is rather a matter of distribution; of poverty which arises through inequality. If wealth were more evenly spread poverty could be eliminated. In the United States in 1969, for instance, 13 per cent of the total population were living below the adequacy level and it would have cost $9 billion to raise them out of poverty,1 but since the last war the G.N.P. in the United States has increased on average by $16 billion annually (at 1966 prices) — a growth rate of roughly 2 per cent.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Peter Townsend (ed.), The Concept of Poverty (Heinemann, 1970).
Wilfred Beckerman, International Comparisons of Real Income (O.E.C.D., 1966).
International Labour Office, The Cost of Social Security 1964–66 (Geneva, 1972) part 2, comparative tables.
United Nations, Demographic Year Book 1971 (New York, 1972).
United Nations, Demographic Year Book 1972 (New York, 1973).
J. E. Meade, Efficiency, Equality and the Ownership of Property (Allen & Unwin, 1964) p. 25.
For discussion of American experience in a variety of community-development experiments, see Peter Marris and Martin Rein, Dilemmas of Social Reform (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967);
Daniel P. Moynihan, Maximum Feasible Misunderstanding (Free Press, 1969);
and James L. Sundquist (ed.), On Fighting Poverty (Basic Books, 1969).
Otis Dudley Duncan, ‘Inheritance of Poverty or Inheritance of Race?’, in On Understanding Poverty, ed. Daniel P. Moynihan (Basic Books, 1968) p. 100.
Juliet Cheetham, ‘Race and Immigration’, in Trends in British Society since 1900, ed. A. H. Halsey (Macmillan, 1972) table 14.5. The apparently favourable position of the Indian immigrants is explained by their tendency to establish themselves as small-scale entrepreneurs — often shop or restaurant owners.
W. W. Daniel, Racial Discrimination in England (Penguin, 1968).
E J. B. Rose et al., Colour and Citizenship (Oxford University Press, 1969) p. 443.
R. H. Tawney, Equality (Allen & Unwin, 1964) p. 57.
Barbara Wootton, The Social Foundations of Wages Policy (Allen & Unwin, 1962).
T. H. Marshall, Citizenship and Social Class, and Other Essays (Cambridge University Press, 1950).
See W. G. Runciman, Relative Deprivation and Social Justice (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966) for an analysis of the nature and significance of class, status and equality in Britain since the war.
See, for instance, R. M. Titmuss, Income Distribution and Social Change (Allen & Unwin, 1962);
Adrian L. Webb and Jack E. B. Sieve, Income Redistribution and the Welfare State (Bell, 1971).
Murray Forsyth, Property and Property Distribution Policy (P.E.P., 1971).
See A. B. Atkinson, Unequal Shares (Allen Lane, The Penguin Press, 1972) for a study of the distribution of wealth in Britain and proposals for making it more equal.
Michael Stewart, ‘The Distribution of Income’, in The Labour Government’s Economic Record 1964–1970, ed. Wilfred Beckerman (Duckworth, 1972).
J. L. Nicholson, Redistribution of Income in the United Kingdom (Bowes & Bowes, 1965).
United Nations, Incomes in Post-War Europe: A Study of Policies, Growth, and Distribution (Geneva, 1967) chap. 6.
Anthony Christopher, George Polyani, Arthur Seldon and Barbara Shenfield, Policy for Poverty (Institute of Economic Affairs, 1970) p. 29.
Gabriel Kolko, Wealth and Power in America (Praeger, 1962) p. 390.
V. N. George, Social Security — Beveridge and After (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968) p. 24;
Frank Field, One Nation: ‘The Conservatives’ Record since June 1970, C.P.A.G. Poverty Pamphlet 12 (September 1972).
See R. M. Titmuss, Commitment to Welfare (Allen & Unwin, 1968) part III, for a discussion of the problem of how to concentrate services on those who most need them without at the same time imposing the stigma of social inferiority.
See, for example, Adela Adam Nevitt, Housing, Taxation and Subsidies (Nelson, 1966) chap. 10.
John Vaizey, The Cost of Education (Allen & Unwin, 1958).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1975 Julia Parker
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parker, J. (1975). Stratification and Welfare. In: Social Policy and Citizenship. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15583-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15583-5_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-18094-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15583-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)