Abstract
This paper is designed to show that the concept of ‘pure monopoly’ and the concept of ‘industry’ can be given precise theoretical definitions, and to argue that these concepts, which some modern economists reject, deserve prominent places in the theory of market structure. These concepts have been wrongly rejected, this article argues, because an excessive reliance on elasticity and cross-elasticity of demand has obscured important aspects of market structure theory.
The authors are indebted to several of their colleagues at Princeton University and at the U.S. Air Force Academy for helpful criticism, especially Professors Jesse Markham, Richard Quandt, Lee Baldwin, Aldrich Finegan, Colonel Wayne Yeoman and Captain Edward Claiborn. None of the critics is responsible for any errors. Both authors are on the faculty of economics at Princeton University, but Lt. Olson is on military leave, stationed at the Department of Economics at the Air Force Academy, which he thanks for generous encouragement of this project. The authors also thank the Princeton University Research Fund for support.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Nicholas Kaldor, ‘Professor Chamberlin on Monopolistic and Imperfect Competition’, Quarterly Journal of Economics LII (May 1938) 526–7.
Robert Triffin, Monopolistic Competition and General Equilibrium Theory (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1940) p. 132.
P. W. S. Andrews, ‘Industrial Analysis in Economics — With Especial Reference to Marshallian Doctrine’, in Oxford Studies in the Price Mechanism, ed. T. Wilson and P. W. S. Andrews (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1951) pp. 139 40.
J. M. Clark, The Economics of Overhead Costs (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1923) p. 417.
Frank H. Knight, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1921) p. 193.
See William Baucool, Welfare Economics and the Theory of the State (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1952) pp. 108–18.
Alfred Marshall, Principles of Economics, 8th ed. (London: Macmillan, 1920) p. 100.
Piero Sraffa, ‘The Laws of Diminishing Returns under Competitive Conditions’, Economic Journal xxxvi (Dec 1926) 545.
Fritz Machlup, ‘Monopoly and Competition: A Classification of Market Positions’, American Economic Review xxvli (Sep 1937) 448.
For example: K. W. Rothschild, ‘The Degree of Monopoly’, Economica, xx (Feb 1942),
and Abba P. Lerner, ‘The Concept of Monopoly and the Measurement of Monopoly Power’, Review of Economic Studies, x (1934).
Joan Robinson, ‘What is Perfect Competition?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, xlix (Nov 1934) 116.
Ralph W. Pfouts and C. E. Ferguson, ‘Market Classification Systems in Theory and Policy’, Southern Economic Journal, xxvi (Oct 1959) 118. These authors state that ‘a satisfactory theoretical system cannot be constructed on the basis of demand elasticity coefficients alone’. We would add that neither elasticity nor cross-elasticity is necessary.
J. R. Hicks, Value and Capital (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953) chaps. ii and iii, esp. p. 48.
For example, E. F. Beach, ‘Triffin’s Classification of Market Positions’, Canadian Journal of Economics and Politics, IX (Feb 1943) 69–74;
William Fellner, Competition Among the Few (New York: Knopf, 1949) pp. 50–4;
A. G. Papandreou, ‘Market Structure and Monopoly Power’, American Economic Review xxxix (Sep 1949) 883–97, esp. 889; Chamberlin, More General Theory pp. 79–81;
and William Fellner, ‘Comment’, American Economic Review xlii (Dec 1953) 898–910.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1972 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Olson, M., McFarland, D. (1972). The Restoration of Pure Monopoly and the Concept of the Industry. In: Rowley, C.K. (eds) Readings in Industrial Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15484-5_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15484-5_16
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-10957-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15484-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)