Skip to main content

Land, Labour and Agriculture

  • Chapter
Growth and Development
  • 14 Accesses

Abstract

In the production function approach to the analysis of the sources of growth, land as a separate factor of production tends to be assumed away or subsumed into capital. There are two main reasons for this. The first is the traditional classical notion of land as a fixed factor of production, which in the long run is undoubtedly true. The second is the practical fact that land without the application of capital is of little use, justifying the treatment of land and capital as one factor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Referencs

  • T. Schultz, Transforming Traditional Agriculture (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Shonfield, Attack on World Poverty (New York: Random House, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • E.g. J. Harris and M. Todaro, ‘Migration, Unemployment and Development: A Two-Sector Analysis’, American Economic Review (Mar 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Lewis, ‘Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour’, Manchester School (May 1954), and ‘Unlimited Supplies of Labour: Further Notes’, Manchester School (Jan 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Enke, ‘Economic Development with Unlimited and Limited Supplies of Labour’, Oxford Economic Papers (June 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Ranis and J. Fei, ‘A Theory of Economic Development’, American Economic Review (Sep 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • See D. Jorgenson, ‘Testing Alternative Theories of the Development of a Dual Economy’, in I. Adelman and E. Thorbecke (eds), The Theory and Design of Economic Development (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Robinson, ‘Types of Disguised Rural Unemployment and Some Policy Implications’, Oxford Economic Papers (Nov 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Adapted from J. Uppal, ‘Work Habits and Disguised’ Unemployment in Underdeveloped Countries: A Theoretical Analysis’, Oxford Economic Papers (Nov 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • The evidence largely relates to the goods market, but since rising productivity (at constant prices) has the same effect on total income as rising prices, it may be taken as indirect evidence for the labour market. See R. Krishna, ‘Agricultural Price Policy and Economic Development’, in H. Southworth and B. Johnston (eds), Agricultural Development and Economic Growth (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1972 A. P. Thirlwall

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thirlwall, A.P. (1972). Land, Labour and Agriculture. In: Growth and Development. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15472-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics