Skip to main content

Accounting Prices

  • Chapter
  • 55 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 2 suggested that, as a first approximation, market prices of final outputs indicated the ‘proper’ valuation of benefits, and market prices of resources the ‘proper’ valuation of costs. The maximand of benefits minus costs, valued in this way, was seen to satisfy the requirement for a ranking function which ordered alternative projects in terms of their social preferredness. The extent to which these prices do comprise a proper valuation must now be investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. P. Samuelson, R. Dorfman and R. Solow, Linear Programming and Economic Analysis (New York, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. F. Kahn, ‘Some Notes on Ideal Output’, Economic Journal (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. W. McKenzie, ‘Ideal Output and the Interdependence of Finns’, Economic Journal (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Dobb, Welfare Economics and the Economics of Socialism (Cambridge, 1969) chap. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. R. Hicks, Value and Capital, 2nd ed. (Oxford, 1946).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Marglin, Public Investment Criteria (London, 1967) esp. chap. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. McKean, ‘Shadow Prices’, in S. B. Chase (ed.), Problems in Public Expenditure Analysis (Brookings Institution, Washington, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Prest and R. Turvey, ‘Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Survey’, Economic Journal (Dec 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. L. Lipsey and K. Lancaster, ‘The General Theory of Second Best’, Review of Economic Studies (1956–7).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Margolis, ‘Comment’ on McKean [7], pp. 71–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. O. Davis and A. Whinston, ‘Welfare Economics and the Theory of the Second Best’, Review of Economic Studies (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Wiseman, ‘The Theory of Public Utility Price: An Empty Box’, Oxford Economic Papers (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Turvey, Optimal Pricing and Investment in Electricity Supply (London, 1968) chap. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Rees, ‘Second Best Rules for Public Enterprise Pricing’, Economica (Aug 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Foster and M. Beesley, ‘Estimating the Social Benefit of Constructing an Underground Railway in London’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series A (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Demsetz, ‘The Exchange and Enforcement of Property Rights’, Journal of Law and Economics (Oct 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. H. Brownlee, ‘User Prices vs. Taxes’, in N.B.E.R., Public Finances: Needs, Sources and Utilisation (Princeton, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Rothenberg, ‘Urban Renewal Programs’, in R. Dorfman (ed.), Measuring Benefits of Government Investments (Brookings Institution, Washington, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1972 Ajit K. Dasgupta and D. W. Pearce

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dasgupta, A.K., Pearce, D.W. (1972). Accounting Prices. In: Cost-Benefit Analysis. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15470-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics