Skip to main content

Utility, Costs and Benefits

  • Chapter
Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • 60 Accesses

Abstract

The basic idea of cost-benefit analysis is simple. To decide on the worth of a project involving public expenditure (or, more extensively, public policy) it is necessary to weigh up the advantages and disadvantages. The province of cost-benefit is usually confined to public projects because the advantages and disadvantages are defined in terms of social gains and losses. It is assumed, correctly one suspects, that most private decisions are not concerned with the wider social effects, but with the effects on profits, sales or producer status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. P. Newman, Theory of Exchange (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1965) pp. 23–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Armstrong, ‘The Determinateness of the Utility Function’, Economic Journal (Sept 1939); and articles in Economic Journal (Sept 1945), Oxford Economic Papers (Janv1950, Oct 1951, Oct 1953 and June 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstem, The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton, 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Marschak, ‘Rational Behaviour, Uncertain Prospects and Measurable Utility’, Econometrica (Apr 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. H. Robertson, Utility and All That and Other Essays (London, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. J. Baumol, ‘The Neumann-Morgenstern Utility Index: An Ordinalist View’, Journal of Political Economy (Feb 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Rothenberg, The Measurement of Social Welfare (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. A. Samuelson, ‘Probability, Utility and the Strong Independence Axiom’, Econometrica (Oct 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. A. Samuelson, R. Dorfman and R. M. Solow, Linear Programming and Economic Analysis (New York, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. E. Mosteller and P. Nogee, ‘An Experimental Measure of Utility’, Journal of Political Economy (Oct 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. A. Simon, Models of Man (New York, 1957) chap. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. W. Churchman, ‘Concepts without Primitives’, Philosophy of Science (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Luce and H. Raiflfa, Games and Decisions (New York, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. O. Wisdom, Other Minds (Oxford, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. F. Strawson, Individuals (London, 1959).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. C. W. Churchman, ‘On the Intercomparison of Utilities’, in S. Krupp (ed.), The Structure of Economic Science (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. M. Dunn, ‘A Problem of Bias in Benefit-Cost Analysis: Consumer Surplus Reconsidered’, Southern Economic Journal (Jan 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. J. Stober, L. Falk and R. Ekelund, ‘Cost Bias in Benefit-Cost Analysis: Comment’, Southern Economic Journal (Apr 1967–8).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1972 Ajit K. Dasgupta and D. W. Pearce

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dasgupta, A.K., Pearce, D.W. (1972). Utility, Costs and Benefits. In: Cost-Benefit Analysis. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15470-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics