Abstract
The increasing responsibilities of the Executive would seem to lead to the conclusion that its greater power has been achieved by a reduction in the power of the Legislature. The situation, therefore, could be represented as a simple sum in subÂtraction. This would be a false simplification, for Parliament works harder than it did before the war, and there has been no formal decree depriving it of its ancient rights. It is possible, alternatively, that the extension in the powers of the Executive has been matched by an extension in the powers of the Legislature; in other words, both branches of government have greater responsibilities. The basis for this belief is that, though governmental control has widened, Parliamentary control, already supposedly strong through the use of questions and open debate, has been tightened still further by new committees, such as those on Statutory Instruments and on Nationalised Industries. It has already been indicated that some procedures, such as Question-time and those involving conÂtrol of the issue of Statutory Instruments and of Special Orders, can leave loopholes which should be closed. It is fair to point out that the same concern is felt by some M.P.
Shortage of time and the specialisation of knowledge are obstacles to full Parliamentary control. An analysis of legislative procedure suggests that there is little chance of time-saving. This is reinÂforced by a study of the Select Committee on Procedure proÂposals of 1958. The inability to adapt procedure to modern conditions has reduced the influence of the House of Commons. Financial procedure is the most conspicuous example of this weakness. Value of select committees.
THEME: The existing machinery for Parliamentary control is imperfect. Bolder use of Parliamentary committees is a possible solution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Further Reading
Lord Campion, An Introduction to the Procedure of the House of Commons (Macmillan, 3rd Edition, 1958).
Eric Taylor, The House of Commons at Work (Pelican Books, 5th Edition, 1963).
H. Hanson and H. V. Wiseman, Parliament at Work (Stevens, 1962). Peter Richards, Honourable Members (Faber, 1959).
K. C. Wheare, Government by Committee (Oxford—Clarendon Press, 2nd Edition, 1955).
Chubb, The Control of National Expenditure (O.U.P., 1952).
P. Einzig, The Control of the Purse (Secker & Warburg, 1959).
R. Butt, The Power of Parliament (Constable, 1967 ).
B. Crick, The Reform of Parliament (Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1964 ).
Sir Ivor Jennings, Parliament (Cambridge University Press, 2nd Edition, 1961).
Hansard Society, Parliamentary Reform 1933–60 (1961).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1971 N. H. Brasher
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brasher, N.H. (1971). The House of Commons Some Procedural Problems. In: Studies in British Government. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15450-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15450-0_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-12550-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15450-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)