Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

Abstract

The clearest conclusion that this Conference has reached is that the market mechanism has not solved social problems and externalities, though it admitted a rather wide divergence of view on whether they can be corrected by price adaptations or by planning. At the other extreme all insisted on the value and actual application of micro-planning. The large corporation was given precedence in our discussions, but any enterprise was expected to undertake some forward arrangement of its affairs. The Conference touched upon, but did not much develop, the problem that the risk and uncertainty for small businessmen is greater than for a big firm, perhaps because the previous I.E.A. Conference in Czechoslovakia had already drawn enough conclusions in the volume Risk and Uncertainty already published.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1971 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaser, M. (1971). Closing Remarks. In: Kaser, M., Portes, R. (eds) Planning and Market Relations. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15410-4_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics