Skip to main content

Political Administration and Social Conditions under the Umayyads

  • Chapter
  • 364 Accesses

Abstract

The administrative divisions of the empire in Umayyad and even ‘Abbāsid times corresponded in general to the provinces of the preceding Byzantine and Persian empires. They comprised: (1) Syria-Palestine; (2) al-Kūfah, including al-‘Irāq; (3) al-Baṣrah with Persia, Sijistān, Khurāsān, al-Bahrayn, ‘Umān and probably Najd and al-Yamāmah; (4) Armenia; (5) al-Ḥijāz; (6) Karmān and the frontier districts of India; (7) Egypt; (8) Ifrīqiyah; (9) al-Yaman and the rest of South Arabia.1 Gradually combinations were made and five viceroyalties resulted. Mu‘āwiyah combined al-Basrah and al-Kūfah into one viceroyalty,2 that of al-‘Irāq, which included most of Persia and eastern Arabia and had al-Kūfah for its capital. Later the viceroy of al-‘Irāq was to have a deputy governor for Khurāsān and Transoxiana, usually residing at Marw, and another for Sind and Panjāb. Likewise al-Ḥijāz, al-Yaman and Central Arabia were combined into another viceroyalty. A-Jazīrah (the northern part of the land between the Tigris and Euphrates) with Armenia, Ādharbayjān and parts of eastern Asia Minor formed the third. Lower and Upper Egypt constituted the fourth. Ifrīqiyah, which embraced northern Africa west of Egypt, Spain, Sicily and other adjacent islands formed the fifth viceroyalty with al-Qayrawān as its seat of government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Cf. ibn-Khaldū, vol. iii, pp. 4, 10, 15, 17, 134–41; Alfred von Kremer, Cultur-geschichte des Orients unter den Chalifen, vol.i (Vienna, 1875), pp. 162–3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Kindi, Kitdb al-Wulāh, ed. R. Guest (Beirut, 1908), pp. 300–301. See also ibn-Qutaybah, Uyūn al-Akhbār, vol. i, p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Nawāji, Halbat al-Kumayt (Cairo. 1299), p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Jābiz, al.Tājfi Akhlāg al-Mulūk, ed. Ahmad Zaki (Cairo, 1914), P. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. B. Bury, The Imperial Administrative System in the Ninth Century (London, 1911), pp. 120 seq.;

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charles Diehl, Byzance: grandeur et décadence (Paris, 1919), p. 154.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Consult Istakhri, p. 59; cf. H. Sauvaire, “Description de Damas: ‘Oyotin etTawârîkh, par Mohammad ebn Châker”, Journal asiatique, ser. 9, vol. vii (1896), p. 400.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Consult H. Lammens, La Syria:précis kistorique (Beirut, 1921, vol. i, pp. 119–20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Ya‘qūbi, Kitāb al-Buldān, ed. de Goeje (Leyden, 1892), p. 339.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cf. Ya‘qūbi, vol. ii, p. 277; T. W. Arnold, The Preaching of Islam, 2nd ed. (London, 1913), p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mas‘ūdi, vol. iv, p. 387. Consult Jurji Zaydān, Ta’rīkh al-Tamaddum al-Isiāmi, 3rd ed. (Cairo, 1922). Vol. v, pp. 22 seq.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1970 Philip K. Hitti

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hitti, P.K. (1970). Political Administration and Social Conditions under the Umayyads. In: History of the Arabs. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15402-9_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15402-9_20

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-09871-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15402-9

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics