Abstract
It may seem that the argument whose most sophisticated PL argument consistency form was developed in the last chapter must be valid since no possible world could be such that “All heads of horses are heads of animals” would be false. Although we can perhaps not conceive of such a world, this failure of conception is not conclusive, as we can see by returning to fundamental questions about validity. We would not, for example, consider the following argument SL valid even though its conclusion is true:
Jeeves is a good butler.
Therefore, Paris is the capital of France.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1970 Robert J. Ackermann
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ackermann, R.J. (1970). Testing for PL Validity. In: Modern Deductive Logic. Modern Introductions to Philosophy. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15396-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15396-1_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-11138-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15396-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)