Abstract
In what follows I discuss and (hopefully) render harmless a doctrine which has a very long ancestry, has constantly reappeared in the history of sociology and still appears to haunt the scene. It was, we might say, conceived by Hobbes, who held that ‘it is necessary that we know the things that are to be compounded before we can know the whole compound’ for ‘everything is best understood by its constitutive causes’, the causes of the social compound residing in ‘men as if but even now sprung out of the earth, and suddenly, like mushrooms, come to full maturity, without all kinds of engagement to each other’.’ It was begat by the thinkers of the Enlightenment, among whom, with a few important exceptions (such as Vico and Montesquieu) an individualist mode of explanation became pre-eminent, though with wide divergences as to what was included, in the characterisation of the explanatory elements. It was confronted by a wide range of thinkers in the early nineteenth century, who brought to the understanding of social life a new perspective, in which collective phenomena were accorded priority in explanation.
The British Journal of Sociology xix (1968). The author thanks Martin Hollis of the University of East Anglia for his comments on this paper.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
L. de Bonald, ‘Theorie du Pouvoir’ (Paris, 1854) i 103.
A. Comte, ‘Système de Politique Positive’ (Paris, 1851) ii 181.
J. S. Mill, ‘A System of Logic’, 9th ed. (London, 1875) ii 469. ‘Men are not’, Mill continues, ‘when brought together, converted into another kind of substance, with different properties’.
See D. Essertier, ‘Psychologie et Sociologie’ (Paris, 1927 ).
Cf. E. Durkheim, ‘Les Règles de la Méthode Sociologique’ (Paris, 1895; 2nd ed. 1901)
G. Tarde, ‘Les Lois Sociales’ (Paris, 1898 ).
See C. H. Cooley, ‘Human Nature and the Social Order’ (New York, 1902). For Cooley, society and the individual are merely ‘the collective and distributive aspects of the same thing’ (pp. 1–2).
See G. Gurvitch, ‘Les Faux Problèmes de la Sociologie au XIXe Siècle’, in ‘La Vocation Actuelle de la Sociologie’ (Paris, 1950) esp. pp 25–37.
See M. Ginsberg, ‘The Individual and Society’, in ‘On the Diversity of Morals’ (London, 1956 ).
See G. C. Homans, ‘Bringing Men Back In’, ‘American Sociological Review’ (1964)
See G. C. Homans, ‘Bringing Men Back In’, ‘American Sociological Review’ (1964)
D. H. Wrong, ‘The Oversocialised Conception of Man in Modern Sociology’, ‘American Sociological Review’ (1961).
D. Hume, ‘Essays Moral and Political’, ed. T. H. Green and T. H. Grose (London, 1875) ii 68.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1970 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lukes, S. (1970). Methodological Individualism Reconsidered. In: Emmet, D., MacIntyre, A. (eds) Sociological Theory and Philosophical Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15388-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15388-6_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-10522-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15388-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)