Abstract
Was Hume here1 claiming or implying that propositions about what men ought to do are radically different from purely factual propositions, and that they cannot ever be entailed by any purely factual propositions? No, despite Mr Hare, Professor Nowell-Smith, Professor Ayer, Miss Murdoch, Professor Flew, Mr Basson, and the Observer’s Brief Guide to philosophy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1969 Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hunter, G. (1969). Hume on is and ought . In: Hudson, W.D. (eds) The Is-Ought Question. Controversies in Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15336-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15336-7_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-10597-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15336-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)