On morality’s having a point

  • D. Z. Phillips
  • H. O. Mounce
Part of the Controversies in Philosophy book series (COIPHIL)

Abstract

In 1958, moral philosophers were given rather startling advice. They were told that their subject was not worth pursuing further until they possessed an adequate philosophy of psychology.1 What is needed, they were told, is an enquiry into what type of characteristic a virtue is, and, furthermore, it was suggested that this question could be resolved in part by exploring the connection between what a man ought to do and what he needs: perhaps man needs certain things in order to flourish, just as a plant needs water; and perhaps what men need are the virtues, courage, honesty, loyalty, etc. Thus, in telling a man that he ought to be honest, we should not be using any special (moral) sense of ought: a man ought to be honest just as a plant ought to be watered. The ‘ought’ is the same: it tells us what a man needs.

Keywords

Amid Settling Defend Blindness Verse 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 5.
    G.H. von Wright, The Varieties of Goodness (Routledge 1963).Google Scholar
  2. 12.
    Georges Sorel, Reflections On Violence, trans. T. E. Hulme (Collier-Macmillan, 1961) pp. 229–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Limited 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Z. Phillips
    • 1
  • H. O. Mounce
    • 2
  1. 1.University CollegeSwanseaUK
  2. 2.University CollegeCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations