Abstract
A new hand turns to an old task when John R. Searle joins those others who purport to offer transport from ‘is’ to ‘ought’ without using such vehicles as ‘evaluative statements, moral principles, or anything of the sort.’1 Mr Searle’s demonstration has two steps. The first presents and defends an instance of an evaluation derived exclusively from descriptive premises. The second step sketches a theory of language capable of generating an indefinite number of cases of the sort given in step one.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1969 Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McClellan, J.E., Komisar, B.P. (1969). On deriving ‘ought’ from ‘is’. In: Hudson, W.D. (eds) The Is-Ought Question. Controversies in Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15336-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15336-7_16
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-10597-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15336-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)