Abstract
In an interesting criticism1 of my paper,2 Kenneth Hanly takes me to task for proposing to do away with ‘ought’ statements. He suggests that the difficulties associated with the is-ought barrier reappear in the use of ‘is’ statements.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1969 Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zimmerman, M. (1969). A note on the ‘is-ought’ barrier. In: Hudson, W.D. (eds) The Is-Ought Question. Controversies in Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15336-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15336-7_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-10597-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15336-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)