Abstract
The leadership of parties tends naturally to assume oligarchic form. A veritable ‘ruling class’ comes into being that is more or less closed; it is an ‘inner circle’ into which it is difficult to penetrate. The phenomenon is just as true of titular leaders as of the real leaders, of autocratic as of democratic rulers. In theory, the principle of election should prevent the formation of an oligarchy; in fact, it seems rather to favour it. The masses are naturally conservative; they become attached to their old leaders, they are suspicious of new faces. Socialist parties, in which the recruitment of leaders is more democratic than in others, find correspondingly greater difficulty in finding new leaders.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1969 Jean Blondel
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Duverger, M. (1969). Oligarchy in Leadership. In: Blondel, J. (eds) Comparative Government. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15318-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15318-3_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-10206-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15318-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)