Abstract
With Stalin’s death, G. M. Malenkov assumed the rank both of Soviet premier and of First Secretary of the Cpsu (Communist Party of the Soviet Union), but within a week N. S. Khrushchev had taken over the Party secretaryship. The great succession struggle would last over four years, before Khrushchev established an undivided ascendancy over all his rivals,1 but the first move by the oligarchy, including Molotov, Bulganin and Kaganovich, which succeeded Stalin, was to ensure its own physical survival. In June 1953 Beria, the head of the State Security Service, was arrested and executed later in the year as a criminal conspirator and agent of British intelligence. Thus began the operation of bringing the vast State Security apparatus, which had upheld Stalin’s tyranny by terror, under Party control, although of course the nature of the Soviet state remained totalitarian. While consolidating its internal position, the new régime pursued a conciliatory foreign policy; the Korean armistice was signed in July, and in August Malenkov made favourable references to the Afro-Asian states, while announcing that Russia now possessed the hydrogen bomb, a claim soon confirmed by Western monitoring devices on 12 August.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See R. Conquest, Power and Policy in the U.S.S.R. (1961), for an account of the Stalin succession problem and Khrushchev’s rise to power.
James Shepley, How Dulles Averted War, 16 January 1956.
See Herman Finer, Dulles Over Suez (1964), ch. 13, and, more particularly, Terence Robertson, Crisis: The Inside Story of the Suez Conspiracy (1965), for the details of Anglo-French-Israeli co-ordination. Both writers draw extensively on French and Israeli sources, including the apparently reliable evidence of the French foreign minister in 1956, M. Pineau, and high Israeli officials, who were directly concerned with the Sèvres understanding.
See R. Goold-Adams, The Time of Power: A Re-appraisal of John Foster Dulles (1962), for a detailed and convincing account of the relationship between Eden and Dulles.
‘Peacefttl coexistence is a specific form of class struggle between socialism and capitalism. The socialist system is victorious in worldwide competition with capitalism, because the socialist mode of production has a decisive advantage over the capitalist mode of production. There is no contradiction whatsoever between the Marxist-Leninist position concerning the inevitability of the victory of Communism and peaceful coexistence….’ Quoted from the official Diplomatic Dictionary edited by Foreign Minister Gromyko (Moscow, 1960) in C. Black and T. Thornton (ed.), Communism and Revolusion (1964), p. 433.
Malcolm Mackintosh, Strategy and Tactics of Soviet Foreign Policy (1962), p. 178.
Copyright information
© 1967 David Rees
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rees, D. (1967). 1953–1957: New Men, New Strategies. In: The Age of Containment. The Making of the Twentieth Century. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15232-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15232-2_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-03074-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15232-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)