Skip to main content

1953–1957: New Men, New Strategies

  • Chapter
The Age of Containment

Part of the book series: The Making of the Twentieth Century

  • 10 Accesses

Abstract

With Stalin’s death, G. M. Malenkov assumed the rank both of Soviet premier and of First Secretary of the Cpsu (Communist Party of the Soviet Union), but within a week N. S. Khrushchev had taken over the Party secretaryship. The great succession struggle would last over four years, before Khrushchev established an undivided ascendancy over all his rivals,1 but the first move by the oligarchy, including Molotov, Bulganin and Kaganovich, which succeeded Stalin, was to ensure its own physical survival. In June 1953 Beria, the head of the State Security Service, was arrested and executed later in the year as a criminal conspirator and agent of British intelligence. Thus began the operation of bringing the vast State Security apparatus, which had upheld Stalin’s tyranny by terror, under Party control, although of course the nature of the Soviet state remained totalitarian. While consolidating its internal position, the new régime pursued a conciliatory foreign policy; the Korean armistice was signed in July, and in August Malenkov made favourable references to the Afro-Asian states, while announcing that Russia now possessed the hydrogen bomb, a claim soon confirmed by Western monitoring devices on 12 August.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See R. Conquest, Power and Policy in the U.S.S.R. (1961), for an account of the Stalin succession problem and Khrushchev’s rise to power.

    Google Scholar 

  2. James Shepley, How Dulles Averted War, 16 January 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Herman Finer, Dulles Over Suez (1964), ch. 13, and, more particularly, Terence Robertson, Crisis: The Inside Story of the Suez Conspiracy (1965), for the details of Anglo-French-Israeli co-ordination. Both writers draw extensively on French and Israeli sources, including the apparently reliable evidence of the French foreign minister in 1956, M. Pineau, and high Israeli officials, who were directly concerned with the Sèvres understanding.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See R. Goold-Adams, The Time of Power: A Re-appraisal of John Foster Dulles (1962), for a detailed and convincing account of the relationship between Eden and Dulles.

    Google Scholar 

  5. ‘Peacefttl coexistence is a specific form of class struggle between socialism and capitalism. The socialist system is victorious in worldwide competition with capitalism, because the socialist mode of production has a decisive advantage over the capitalist mode of production. There is no contradiction whatsoever between the Marxist-Leninist position concerning the inevitability of the victory of Communism and peaceful coexistence….’ Quoted from the official Diplomatic Dictionary edited by Foreign Minister Gromyko (Moscow, 1960) in C. Black and T. Thornton (ed.), Communism and Revolusion (1964), p. 433.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Malcolm Mackintosh, Strategy and Tactics of Soviet Foreign Policy (1962), p. 178.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1967 David Rees

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rees, D. (1967). 1953–1957: New Men, New Strategies. In: The Age of Containment. The Making of the Twentieth Century. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15232-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15232-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-03074-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15232-2

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics