Abstract
The most striking difference between Marx and the orthodox economists appears in the conception of surplus. To Marx, depreciation and wages are the only necessary costs of production, and rent, interest and profit are all subdivisions of surplus. In the orthodox system, rent of land is a surplus, because land is a “free gift of nature”, and would exist just as much if no payment were made for it, but interest and profits are the necessary supply price for capital, without which it would not be forthcoming. Wages, interest and profit are grouped together as “the reward of human efforts and sacrifices”. Thus attention is distracted from the distinction between income from work and income from property, and a moral justification is provided for interest and profit.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1966 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Robinson, J. (1966). The Orthodox Theory of Profit. In: An Essay on Marxian Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15228-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15228-5_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-05800-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15228-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)