Abstract
The problem before us is the link between the size and the efficiency of the United States. The problem might be put narrowly: do the obstacles that political boundaries raise to the movement of goods, men, money, and ideas impose fewer disadvantages on the large economy of the United States than on the smaller economies of other countries? To this question most of us would nod our heads quickly, and we would support the answer along the following lines. The United States has open to it whatever opportunities for efficiency are provided by wide markets despite the obstacles to international trade. Some, perhaps many, of these opportunities may be open even in countries not nearly as large as the United States; but there must be some which appear only in the very largest of economies. We may presume, also, that the opportunities opened by wide markets are not neglected in the United States. The vast size of the American economy therefore probably contributes in some degree to the high level of American efficiency.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
United Nations, ‘National and Per Capita Incomes of Seventy Countries in 1949 Expressed in United States Dollars’, Statistical Papers, Series E, No. 1, October 1950.
M. Gilbert and I. B. Kravis, An International Comparison of National Products and the Purchasing Power of Currencies, Organization for European Economic Co-operation, 1954.
C. Clark, Conditions of Economic Progress, Macmillan, 1940; 3rd ed., 1957.
S. Kuznets, ‘National Income and Industrial Structure’, Proceedings of the International Statistical Conference, 1947, Vol. V, Calcutta, 1951; reprinted in Economic Change, New York, Norton, 1953.
R. W. Goldsmith in 37th Annual Report of the National Bureau of Economic Research, May 1957.
C. W. Cobb and P. H. Douglas, ‘A Theory of Production’, American Economic Review, Supplement, March 1928.
P. H. Douglas, ‘Are There Laws of Production?’, American Economic Review, March 1948.
D. Durand, ‘Some Thoughts on Marginal Productivity with Special Reference to Professor Douglas’ Analysis’, Journal of Political Economy, December 1937.
S. Fabricant, The Output of Manufacturing Industries, 1899–1937, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1940.
D. Creamer, ‘Capital and Output Trends in Manufacturing Industries, 1880- 1948’, Occasional Paper 41, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1954.
Burton Wall, ‘A Cobb-Douglas Function for the United States Manufacturing and Mining, 1920–1940’ (abstract), Econometrica, April 1948.
S. Kuznets, Income and Wealth of the United States, Trends and Structure, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, Series II, 1952.
M. Abramovitz, ‘Resource and Output Trends in the United States since 1870’, American Economic Review, May 1956 (reprinted as Occasional Paper 52, National Bureau of Economic Research).
J. Kendrick, ‘Productivity Trends: Capital and Labour’, Review of Economics and Statistics, August 1956 (reprinted as Occasional Paper 53, National Bureau of Economic Research); and forthcoming fuller report of the National Bureau.
E. Rothbarth, ‘Causes of the Superior Efficiency of U.S.A. Industry as Compared with British Industry’, Economic Journal, September 1946.
A. Marshall, Industry and Trade, Macmillan, 1923.
Anglo-American Council on Productivity, Productivity Team Reports, London, various dates around 1950.
G. Stigler, ‘The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the Market’, Journal of Political Economy, June 1951.
J. Viner, ‘Cost Curves and Supply Curves’, 1931; reprinted with supplementary notes in Readings in Price Theory, Irwin, 1952.
A. A. Young, ‘Increasing Returns and Economic Progress’, Economic Journal, December 1928.
A. A. Young, ‘Increasing Returns and Economic Progress’, Economic Journal, December 1928.
J-Jewkes, ‘The Size of the Factory’, Economic Journal, June 1952.
Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, Business Concentration and Price Policy, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1955.
G. Rosenbluth, Concentration in Canadian Manufacturing Industries, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1957.
Mention may be made of an international cross-sectional analysis along Douglas’ lines, attempted by a student of his (E. C. Olson, ‘Factors Affecting International Differences in Production’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, May 1948). Output was taken to be a homogeneous function of labour input, energy consumed, animal stock, and arable area. Fairish fits were obtained, using data for around 1937, but the estimates are very crude and it is, in any case, difficult to interpret the rôle of an item like energy consumption.
L. Rostas, Comparative Productivity in British and American Industry, Occasional Paper XIII, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, Cambridge, 1948.
M. Frankel, ‘British and American Manufacturing Productivity, A Comparison and Interpretation’, University of Illinois Bulletin, February 1957.
T. Hultgren, in 37th Annual Report of the National Bureau of Economic Research, May 1957.
S. Kuznets, ‘Quantitative Aspects of the Economic Growth of Nations, I. Levels and Variability of Rates of Growth’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, October 1956.
Similar calculations may be made for the United Kingdom and Canada, for shorter periods, with similar results; see Colin Clark, Conditions of Economic Progress, and A. Maddison, ‘Productivity in Canadian Manufacturing, 1935–48’, Canadian Journal of Economic and Political Science, May 1953.
G. T. Jones, Increasing Returns, Cambridge, 1933.
S. Fabricant, Employment in Manufacturing Industries, 1899–1939, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1942;
J. Kendrick, ‘Productivity Trends: Capital and Labor’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 1956.
G. D. A. MacDougall, ‘British and American Exports: A Study Suggested by the Theory of Comparative Costs’, Economic Journal, December 1951 and September 1952.
S. Kuznets, Secular Movements in Production and Prices, Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1930.
A. F. Burns, Production Trends in the United States since 1870, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1934.
Conference on Research in Income and Wealth, Regional Income, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1957.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1960 International Economic Association
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fabricant, S. (1960). Study of the Size and Efficiency of the American Economy. In: Robinson, E.A.G. (eds) Economic Consequences of the Size of Nations. International Economic Association Conference Volumes. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15210-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15210-0_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-15212-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-15210-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)