Skip to main content

Study of the Size and Efficiency of the American Economy

  • Chapter
Economic Consequences of the Size of Nations

Abstract

The problem before us is the link between the size and the efficiency of the United States. The problem might be put narrowly: do the obstacles that political boundaries raise to the movement of goods, men, money, and ideas impose fewer disadvantages on the large economy of the United States than on the smaller economies of other countries? To this question most of us would nod our heads quickly, and we would support the answer along the following lines. The United States has open to it whatever opportunities for efficiency are provided by wide markets despite the obstacles to international trade. Some, perhaps many, of these opportunities may be open even in countries not nearly as large as the United States; but there must be some which appear only in the very largest of economies. We may presume, also, that the opportunities opened by wide markets are not neglected in the United States. The vast size of the American economy therefore probably contributes in some degree to the high level of American efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. United Nations, ‘National and Per Capita Incomes of Seventy Countries in 1949 Expressed in United States Dollars’, Statistical Papers, Series E, No. 1, October 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Gilbert and I. B. Kravis, An International Comparison of National Products and the Purchasing Power of Currencies, Organization for European Economic Co-operation, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Clark, Conditions of Economic Progress, Macmillan, 1940; 3rd ed., 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Kuznets, ‘National Income and Industrial Structure’, Proceedings of the International Statistical Conference, 1947, Vol. V, Calcutta, 1951; reprinted in Economic Change, New York, Norton, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. W. Goldsmith in 37th Annual Report of the National Bureau of Economic Research, May 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. W. Cobb and P. H. Douglas, ‘A Theory of Production’, American Economic Review, Supplement, March 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. H. Douglas, ‘Are There Laws of Production?’, American Economic Review, March 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Durand, ‘Some Thoughts on Marginal Productivity with Special Reference to Professor Douglas’ Analysis’, Journal of Political Economy, December 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Fabricant, The Output of Manufacturing Industries, 1899–1937, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Creamer, ‘Capital and Output Trends in Manufacturing Industries, 1880- 1948’, Occasional Paper 41, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Burton Wall, ‘A Cobb-Douglas Function for the United States Manufacturing and Mining, 1920–1940’ (abstract), Econometrica, April 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Kuznets, Income and Wealth of the United States, Trends and Structure, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, Series II, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Abramovitz, ‘Resource and Output Trends in the United States since 1870’, American Economic Review, May 1956 (reprinted as Occasional Paper 52, National Bureau of Economic Research).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Kendrick, ‘Productivity Trends: Capital and Labour’, Review of Economics and Statistics, August 1956 (reprinted as Occasional Paper 53, National Bureau of Economic Research); and forthcoming fuller report of the National Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. Rothbarth, ‘Causes of the Superior Efficiency of U.S.A. Industry as Compared with British Industry’, Economic Journal, September 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Marshall, Industry and Trade, Macmillan, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Anglo-American Council on Productivity, Productivity Team Reports, London, various dates around 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Stigler, ‘The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the Market’, Journal of Political Economy, June 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Viner, ‘Cost Curves and Supply Curves’, 1931; reprinted with supplementary notes in Readings in Price Theory, Irwin, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. A. Young, ‘Increasing Returns and Economic Progress’, Economic Journal, December 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. A. Young, ‘Increasing Returns and Economic Progress’, Economic Journal, December 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J-Jewkes, ‘The Size of the Factory’, Economic Journal, June 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, Business Concentration and Price Policy, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. Rosenbluth, Concentration in Canadian Manufacturing Industries, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mention may be made of an international cross-sectional analysis along Douglas’ lines, attempted by a student of his (E. C. Olson, ‘Factors Affecting International Differences in Production’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, May 1948). Output was taken to be a homogeneous function of labour input, energy consumed, animal stock, and arable area. Fairish fits were obtained, using data for around 1937, but the estimates are very crude and it is, in any case, difficult to interpret the rôle of an item like energy consumption.

    Google Scholar 

  26. L. Rostas, Comparative Productivity in British and American Industry, Occasional Paper XIII, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, Cambridge, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Frankel, ‘British and American Manufacturing Productivity, A Comparison and Interpretation’, University of Illinois Bulletin, February 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  28. T. Hultgren, in 37th Annual Report of the National Bureau of Economic Research, May 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. Kuznets, ‘Quantitative Aspects of the Economic Growth of Nations, I. Levels and Variability of Rates of Growth’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, October 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Similar calculations may be made for the United Kingdom and Canada, for shorter periods, with similar results; see Colin Clark, Conditions of Economic Progress, and A. Maddison, ‘Productivity in Canadian Manufacturing, 1935–48’, Canadian Journal of Economic and Political Science, May 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  31. G. T. Jones, Increasing Returns, Cambridge, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  32. S. Fabricant, Employment in Manufacturing Industries, 1899–1939, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1942;

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Kendrick, ‘Productivity Trends: Capital and Labor’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  34. G. D. A. MacDougall, ‘British and American Exports: A Study Suggested by the Theory of Comparative Costs’, Economic Journal, December 1951 and September 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  35. S. Kuznets, Secular Movements in Production and Prices, Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  36. A. F. Burns, Production Trends in the United States since 1870, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Conference on Research in Income and Wealth, Regional Income, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1960 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fabricant, S. (1960). Study of the Size and Efficiency of the American Economy. In: Robinson, E.A.G. (eds) Economic Consequences of the Size of Nations. International Economic Association Conference Volumes. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15210-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics