Skip to main content

Labour Market Theory and Empirical Research

  • Chapter
Book cover The Theory of Wage Determination

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

Abstract

Economic theory provides a model of the operation of the labour market which helps to explain wage differentials and the allocation of labour between employers, occupations, industries, and regions as the market tends to move toward equilibrium. Marshall, for example, pointed to the ‘tendency’ of competition to result in ‘equality of efficiency-earnings in the same district’, and he added: 1

This tendency will be the stronger, the greater is the mobility of labour, the less strictly specialized it is, the more keenly parents are on the look-out for the most advantageous occupations for their children, the more rapidly they are able to adapt themselves to changes in economic conditions, and lastly the slower and the less violent these changes are.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. J. E. Cairnes, Some Leading Principles of Political Economy (1874), p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gladys L. Palmer and Acta M. Stoflet, The Labor Force of the Philadelphia Radio Industry in 1936; Helen Herrmann, Teh Years of Work Experience of Philadelphia Weavers and Loomfixers (all WPA National Research Project reports done in co-operation with the Industrial Research Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 1938);

    Google Scholar 

  3. Herbert G. Heneman, Jr., ‘Differential Short-Run Labor Mobilities’ (1941–1942), in Minnesota Manpower Mobilities (October 1950);

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lloyd G. Reynolds, The Structure of Labor Markets (1951);

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charles A. Myers and W. Rupert Maclaurin, The Movement of Factory Workers (1943);

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charles A. Myers and George P. Shultz, The Dynamics of a Labor Market (1951);

    Google Scholar 

  7. Richard A. Lester, Hiring Practices and Labor Competition (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gladys L. Palmer, Labor Mobility in Six Cities: A Report on the Survey of Patterns and Factors in Labor Mobility, 1940–1950 (June 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  9. For an interpretative summary, see George P. Shultz, ‘Recent Research on Labor Mobility’, Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association (December 28–29, 1951), pp. 110–118.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A longer analysis of mobility studies will be found in the report by Herbert S. Parnes, Research on Labor, Mobility: An Appraisal of Research Findings in the United States, Bulletin 65, Social Science Research Council (September 1954). Essays on the significance of some of the local labour market studies, written by members of the Committee on Labor Market Research, are found in Labor Mobility and Economic Opportunity (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Palmer, Labor Mobility, appendix, tables 15 and 18. A special study in San Francisco showed that the professional and technical group was relatively ‘closed’, i.e. there was not much movement into or out of the group during the decade. This was also borne out in a study of the lifetime work histories of 935 male heads of families in Oakland, California. Professionals had been in their present occupational group 80 per cent of their working lives. In contrast, more than a third of the persons who owned their own businesses (included in the managers, officials, and proprietors group) came from manual occupations. Seymour M. Lipset and Reinhard Bendix, ‘Social Mobility and Occupational Career Patterns’, American Journal of Sociology (January–March 1952), pp. 369–370 and 496–497.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gertrude Bancroft, ‘Trends in the Labor Force’, Manpower in the United States, William Haber et al ed. (1954), pp. 138, 139.

    Google Scholar 

  13. I am indebted to Dr. Gladys L. Palmer of the University of Pennsylvania for this information. The studies are: (1) Rudolph Meidner, Svensk arbetsmarknad vid vull sysselsattning (The Swedish Labor Market at Full Employment), Konjunkturinstitutet, Stockholm, 1954; (2) L’Enqué pour sondage sur l’emploi, Institut National de la Statistique et des études Economiques, Paris; (3) Geoffrey Thomas, Labour Mobility in Great Britain, 1945–1949, London, The Social Survey (mimeographed).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

John T. Dunlop

Copyright information

© 1957 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Myers, C.A. (1957). Labour Market Theory and Empirical Research. In: Dunlop, J.T. (eds) The Theory of Wage Determination. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15205-6_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics