Skip to main content

The House of Lords

  • Chapter
Mastering British Politics

Part of the book series: Macmillan Master Series ((MACMMA))

  • 124 Accesses

Abstract

As we saw in Chapter 9, an important — possibly the most important — feature of the British constitution is its capacity gradually to adapt to changing circumstances. In this respect the House of Lords is a microcosm of the British constitution, since throughout its long history it has been able to do just this. In contrast to other Second Chambers elsewhere in the world which have been specifically created with powers and composition clearly defined in basic constitutional documents, the House of Lords is the product of history. It was not created by Founding Fathers or under a Basic Law; it has simply developed and changed organically in the soil of British history. This is not to say that its evolution has been linear or continuous; on the contrary, it has been haphazard, spasmodic and uncertain. Yet it has survived for a very long time and its evolutionary adaptability will probably enable it to survive a good while longer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  • Bagehot, W., The English Constitution (London: Fontana, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin N.D.J., The House of Lords (Barnstaple: Philip Charles Media, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromhead, P.A., The House of Lords and Contemporary Politics (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Constitution Unit, Reform of the House of Lords (London: The Constitution Unit, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, B. and Carmichael, P. (eds), The House of Lords: Its Parliamentary and Judicial Roles (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, J.A.G., Ryle, M. and Wheeler-Booth, M.A.J., Parliament: Functions, Practice and Procedures (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Initial report of The Constitutional Commission to Consider Options for a New Second Chamber (Chair: Lord Mackay of Clashfean), (London: Constitutional Commission, September 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Limon, D. and McKay, W.R., (eds) Erskine May’s Treatise on the Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament (22nd ed), (London: Butterworths, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J.P., The House of Lords and the Labour Government, 1964–70 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, P. (ed.), Parliament in the 1980s (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shell, D., The House of Lords (2nd ed) (Oxford: Philip Allan, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shell, D. and Beamish, D. (eds), The House of Lords at Work (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E.A., The House of Lords in British Politics & Society 1815–1911 (London: Longman, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J., The House of Lords (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • White Paper, ‘Modernising Parliament: Reforming the House of Lords’, CM 4183 (London: Stationery Office, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

Website

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1999 F.N. Forman and N.D.J. Baldwin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Forman, F.N., Baldwin, N.D.J. (1999). The House of Lords. In: Mastering British Politics. Macmillan Master Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15045-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics