Skip to main content

The Elephant and the Butterfly: Or Hysteresis and Post Keynesian Economics

  • Chapter
Uncertainty, International Money, Employment and Theory
  • 99 Accesses

Abstract

I welcome Rod Cross’s comments suggesting that the New Keynesian conceptualization of ‘hysteresis’ is ‘amenable’ and ‘relevant to the Post Keynesian understanding of economic processes’, where economic events occur in a historical context with an uncertain future. More than one-half century after Keynes’ criticism of ‘Professor Tinbergen’s Method’ (1937) of analysing time series econometrically under the assumption of stationarity, it is gratifying to note that some macroeconometricians are trying to develop an analysis that deals with changing macrofactors that both affect, and are affected by, agents’ behaviour.

This paper was published in the Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 15 (1993).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Blanchard, O. J. and Summers, L. H. (1986), ‘Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem’, NBER Macroeconomic Annual 1986, by S. Fischer (ed.) (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, J. (1983), Dynamic Economic Systems (Armonk: M. E. Sharpe).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. (1956), The Image (Ann Arbor: Michigan State University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiano, L. J. and Eichenbaum, M. (1990), ‘Unit Roots in Real GNP: Do We Know and Do We Care?’, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series in Public Policy, 32 (Amsterdam: North Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R. (ed.) (1988), Unemployment, Hysteresis and the Natural Rate Hypothesis (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R. (1991), The NAIRU: Not an Uninteresting Rate of Unemployment?’ mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R. (1993), ‘Hysteresis and Post Keynesian Economics’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R. and Hutchinson H. (1988), ‘Hysteresis Effects and Unemployment: An Outline’, in Unemployment, Hysteresis and The Natural Rate Hypothesis by R. Cross (ed.) (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P. (1982–3), ‘Rational Expectations: A Fallacious Foundation for Studying Crucial Decision Making Processes’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P. (1991). ‘Is Probability Theory Relevant for Uncertainty? A Post Keynesian Perspective’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diggle, P. J. (1990), Time Series; A Biostatistical Introduction (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemming, J. (1988), ‘Introduction’, in Unemployment, Hysteresis and The Natural Rate Hypothesis, by R. Cross (ed.) (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz, W. (1987), ‘Hysteresis, Persistence and the NAIRU’, in The Fight Against Unemployment, by R. Layard and L. Calmfors (ed.) (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz, W. (1990), ‘Hysteresis in Economic Relationships: An Overview’, Empirical Economics, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1974), ‘Comments on the Critics’, in Milton Friedman’s Monetary Framework: A Debate with his Critics, by R. J. Gordon (ed.) (Chicago: Chicago University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, W. A. (1976), Introduction to Statistical Time Series (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. A. (1990) ‘What is New Keynesian Economics?’ Journal of Economic Literature, 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzner, D. (1993), ‘Some Notes on the role of History and the Definition of Hysteresis and Related Concepts in Economic Analysis’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (New York: Harcourt, Brace).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1937), ‘The General Theory’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, reprinted in The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. XIV, by D. Moggridge (ed.) (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R., Nickell, S. J. and Jackman, R. (1991), Unemployment: Macroperformance and the Labour Market (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinvaud, E. (1970), Statistical Methods of Econometrics (Amersterdam: North-Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Setterfield, M. (1992), ‘Towards a Long Run Theory of Effective Demand: Modelling Macroeconomic Systems with Hysteresis’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J. H. and Watson, M. W. (1988), ‘Variable Trends in Economic Time Series’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wold, H. O. A. (1965), Bibliography on Time Series and Stochastic Processes (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyplosz, C. (1987), ‘Comments’, in The Fight Against Unemployment, by R. Layard and L. Calmfors (eds) (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaglom, A. M. (1986), Correlation Theory of Stationarity and Related Random Functions, Vol I (New York: Springer-Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Louise Davidson

Copyright information

© 1999 Paul Davidson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davidson, L. (1999). The Elephant and the Butterfly: Or Hysteresis and Post Keynesian Economics. In: Davidson, L. (eds) Uncertainty, International Money, Employment and Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14991-9_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics