Conversion of Military R&D: Concepts and Complications
The term ‘conversion’ implies a deep change. It involves a radical transformation. When applied to military industries the idea of conversion recalls the age-old vision of a society without war in which swords would be turned into plowshares.
KeywordsMilitary Expenditure Military Spending North Atlantic Treaty Organization Procurement Process Military Industry
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Jan Oberg, ‘Is the Conversion Idea to be Converted? Some Sceptical Comments from a Non-Convert,’ in Militarization and Arms Production, ed. Helena Tuomi and Raimo Vayrynen (Beckenham: Croom Helm, 1983), p. 295.Google Scholar
- 3.See Council for Science and Society, UK Military R&D (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986);Google Scholar
- and Ian Davis, Military R&D in Europe: Collaboration Without Control?, Current Decisions Report No. 11 (Oxford: Oxford Research Group, October 1992), p. iv.Google Scholar
- 4.Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (POST), Relationships Between Defence & Civil Science and Technology (London: POST, May 1991), p. 4.Google Scholar
- 5.Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, Conversion and Diversification of Defence Technology and Manufacturing (London: POST, October 1992), p. 7.Google Scholar
- 9.Inga Thorsson, In Pursuit of Disarmament: Conversion from Military to Civil Production in Sweden, 2 vols. (Stockholm: Liber, 1984–85), 1A, p. 301.Google Scholar
- 11.See, for instance, Robert DeGrasse, Jr., Military Expansion, Economic Decline: The Impact of Military Spending on U.S. Economic Performance (New York: M.E. Sharp with Council on Economic Priorities, 1983);Google Scholar
- and Malcolm Chalmers, Paying for Defence: Military Spending and British Decline (London: Pluto Press, 1985).Google Scholar
- 14.K. Adelman and N. Augustine, ‘Defense Conversion: Bulldozing the Management,’ Foreign Affairs 71 (Spring 1992), pp. 26–47.Google Scholar