Skip to main content

Conversion of Military R&D: Concepts and Complications

  • Chapter
Conversion of Military R & D
  • 34 Accesses

Abstract

The term ‘conversion’ implies a deep change. It involves a radical transformation. When applied to military industries the idea of conversion recalls the age-old vision of a society without war in which swords would be turned into plowshares.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Jan Oberg, ‘Is the Conversion Idea to be Converted? Some Sceptical Comments from a Non-Convert,’ in Militarization and Arms Production, ed. Helena Tuomi and Raimo Vayrynen (Beckenham: Croom Helm, 1983), p. 295.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Council for Science and Society, UK Military R&D (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986);

    Google Scholar 

  3. and Ian Davis, Military R&D in Europe: Collaboration Without Control?, Current Decisions Report No. 11 (Oxford: Oxford Research Group, October 1992), p. iv.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (POST), Relationships Between Defence & Civil Science and Technology (London: POST, May 1991), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, Conversion and Diversification of Defence Technology and Manufacturing (London: POST, October 1992), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Inga Thorsson, In Pursuit of Disarmament: Conversion from Military to Civil Production in Sweden, 2 vols. (Stockholm: Liber, 1984–85), 1A, p. 301.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See, for instance, Robert DeGrasse, Jr., Military Expansion, Economic Decline: The Impact of Military Spending on U.S. Economic Performance (New York: M.E. Sharp with Council on Economic Priorities, 1983);

    Google Scholar 

  8. and Malcolm Chalmers, Paying for Defence: Military Spending and British Decline (London: Pluto Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peter Southwood, Disarming Military Industries: Turning an Outbreak of Peace into an Enduring Legacy (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1991).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Adelman and N. Augustine, ‘Defense Conversion: Bulldozing the Management,’ Foreign Affairs 71 (Spring 1992), pp. 26–47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Southwood, P., Andreev, Y. (1998). Conversion of Military R&D: Concepts and Complications. In: Reppy, J. (eds) Conversion of Military R & D. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14886-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics