Compression Failure Theories

  • Arnold W. Hendry


Consideration of qualitative evidence and empirical relationships as discussed in chapter 2, while extremely valuable and indeed providing the basis for structural design codes, does not provide a detailed insight into the behaviour of masonry. A number of investigators have therefore attempted to derive theories of failure based on the fundamental properties of the component materials. The earliest of these would appear to be due to Haller [1], published in 1959. Haller’s formula, however, can give masonry strengths exceeding that of the masonry unit and is thus not generally valid.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P. Haller, ‘The Physics of the Fired Brick: Part One Strength Properties’, Libr. Commun. Bldg Res. Stn., 929 (1960) (trans. G. L. Cairns).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. J. Francis, C. B. Horman and L. E. Jerrems, ‘The Effect of Joint Thickness and other Factors on the Compressive Strength of Brickwork’, Proceedings of the Second International Brick Masonry Conference (Stoke-on-Trent) 1971, eds H. W. H. West and K. H. Speed (British Ceramic Research Association, Stoke-on-Trent 1971), pp. 31–7.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. Totaro, ‘A Hybrid Elastic Theory for Evaluation of Compressive Strength fo Brick Masonry’, Proceedings of the Tenth International Brick and Block Masonry Conference (Calgary) 1994, pp. 1443–51.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. G. Shrive and E. L. Jessop, ‘An Examination of the Failure Mechanism of Masonry Piers, Prisms and Walls Subjected to Compression’, Proc. Br. Ceram. Soc., 30 (1982) 110–17.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. K. Hilsdorf, ‘An Investigation into the Failure Mechanism of Brick Masonry Loaded in Axial Compression’, in Designing, Engineering and Constructing with Masonry Products, ed. F. B. Johnson (Gulf, Houston, Tex., 1969), pp. 34–41.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. L. Khoo and A. W. Hendry, ‘A Failure Criterion for Brickwork in Axial Compression’, Proceedings of the Third International Brick Masonry Conference (Essen) 1973, eds L. Foertig and K. Gobel (Bundesverband der Deutschen Ziegelindustrie, Bonn, 1975), pp. 139–45.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. L. Khoo and A. W. Hendry, ‘Strength Tests on Brick and Mortar under Complex Stresses for the Development of a Failure Criterion for Brickwork in Compression’, Proc. Br. Ceram. Soc., 21 (1973) 57–66.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. L. Khoo, ‘A Failure Criterion for Brickwork in Axial Compression’, PhD Thesis (University of Edinburgh, 1972).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. G. Balmer, ‘Shearing Strength of Concrete under High Triaxial Stress, Computation of Mohr’s Stress Envelope as a Curve’, Report No. 5P23 (Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Colo., 1949).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. N. W. Akroyd, ‘Concrete under Triaxial Stress’, Mag. Concr. Res., 13 (1961) 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. J. Gardner, ‘Triaxial Behavior of Concrete’, J. Am. Concr. Inst., 66 (1969) 136.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ‘Small Scale Specimen Testing’, National Testing Program (Structural Clay Products Research Foundation, Geneva, Ill., 1964).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. H. Atkinson, J. L. Noland and D. P. Abrams, ‘A Deformation Theory for Stack Bonded Masonry Prisms in Compression’, Proceedings of the Seventh International Brick Masonry Conference (Melbourne) 1982, pp. 565–76.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Ohler, ‘Zur Berechnung der Druckfestigeit von Mauerwerk unter Berucksichtigung der mehrachsigen Spannungszustande in Stein und Mörtel’, Bautechnik, 5 (1986).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. A. Hamid and R. G. Drysdale, ‘Suggested Failure Criteria for Grouted Concrete Masonry under Axial Compression’, ACI Journal, 80 (1983) 102–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Arnold W. Hendry 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnold W. Hendry
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of EdinburghUK
  2. 2.The British Masonry SocietyUK

Personalised recommendations