Skip to main content

Is Simulation the Answer?

  • Chapter
Clinical Skills in Nursing

Part of the book series: Nurse Education in Practice ((NEP))

Abstract

The introduction of Project 2000 curricula (UKCC, 1986) has meant that students of nursing now spend less time (40 per cent of the total as opposed to 60 per cent pre-Project 2000) in a much wider variety of hospital- and community-based clinical placements. As Neary (1997) comments, the practical experience now extends into ‘homes, schools, factories, shops and every community agency even remotely connected to healthcare delivery’ (1997: 46). This, and the large number of students in each cohort to be accommodated, means that students spend less time on placement in hospital wards, where nurses have traditionally learnt or refined most of their clinical skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Clifford, C (1994) Assessment of clinical practice and the role of the nurse teacher. Nurse Education Today 14: 272–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cream, B W, Eggemeier, F T and Klein, G (1978) A strategy for the development of training devices. Human Factors 20: 145–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, J (1984) Structured experience: a risk free approach to reality-based learning. Journal of Nursing Education 23(1): 34–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gohring, R J (1979) All in the game. Discovery 3: 20–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, G E and Gomez, E A (1987) Learning of psychomotor skills: laboratory versus patient care setting. Journal of Nursing Education 26(1): 20–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harden, R and Gleeson, F (1979) Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Medical Education 13: 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegstad, L N and Zsohar, H (1986) A study of the cost effectiveness of providing psychomotor practice in teaching intravenous infusion techniques. Journal of Nursing Education 25(1): 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, S E and Shugart, E B (1984) Evaluation: is simulation the answer? Journal of Nursing Education, 23(2): 84–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neary, M (1994) Teaching practical skills in colleges. Nursing Standard, 8(27): 35–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neary, M (1997) Project 2000 students’ survival kit: a return to the practical room (nursing skills laboratory). Nurse Education Today 17: 46–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J, While, A and Fitzpatrick, M (1992) Simulation: current status in nurse education. Nurse Education Today 12: 409–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting (1986) Project 2000: A New Preparation for Practice. London: UKCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • While, A (1991) The problem of clinical evaluation — a review. Nurse Education Today 11: 448–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitis, G (1985) Simulation in teaching clinical nursing. Journal of Nursing Education 24(4): 161–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildman, S and Reeves, M (1996) The utilisation and evaluation of a simulation game in pre-registration nurse education. Nurse Education Today 16: 334–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 Maggie Nicol

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nicol, M. (1999). Is Simulation the Answer?. In: Nicol, M., Glen, S. (eds) Clinical Skills in Nursing. Nurse Education in Practice . Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14724-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14724-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-72614-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-14724-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics