Chamberlain & Co.

Part of the British Studies Series book series (BRSS)


The original National Government was ‘a collection of people collected together to save the situation’, and no one expected it to last; but having failed to ‘save the situation’, its members proved more adept at saving themselves.1 The decision by the mass of the Labour Party to oppose the government’s economy programme, and its promises to restore the cuts and soak the rich, had helped ensure that August’s expedient became October’s permanency. The task which had fallen to the Conservatives — of acting as the bulwark against Socialism and supporting fostering moderate Labour — had now fallen to the ‘National’ Government which incorporated what was left of that last ravaged entity. This, along with the economic crisis and the rhetoric upon which the election had been fought, would have precluded any crude schemes to drop MacDonald and company, even had Baldwin not felt in honour bound to the former Labour leader.2 But the Conservative dominance does not mean that we can accept Labour’s claims that ‘National’ was a label signifying the same as Conservative.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 6.
    John Charmley, Churchill: the end of glory (1993), p. 275.Google Scholar
  2. 10.
    R. A. Butler, The Art of the Possible (1972), p. 30.Google Scholar
  3. 15.
    R. A. C. Parker, Neville Chamberlain and Appeasement (1994);Google Scholar
  4. D. C. Watt, How War Came (1989)Google Scholar
  5. and John Charmley, Chamberlain and the lost peace (1989) for the different views.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© John Charmley 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of East AngliaEngland

Personalised recommendations