Skip to main content

Domestic Violence and Occupation of the Family Home

  • Chapter
Book cover Family Law

Part of the book series: Macmillan Law Masters ((MLM))

  • 54 Accesses

Abstract

Domestic violence takes many forms. It includes not just physical assault but psychological and emotional molestation or harassment and includes pestering, nagging, making nuisance telephone calls, and intimidation. Sometimes the violence is extremely severe and results in a criminal conviction. In R v. Kowalski (1988) Cr App R 339, [1988] 1 FLR 447, for example, the appellant forced his wife to have oral sex and sexual intercourse by threatening her with a knife and in R v. Brown (1993) 14 Cr App R 434 the defendant kicked the front door in and forced his ex-girlfriend to have oral sex, raped her and then kicked her about the head. Despite the difficulty of establishing what goes on behind locked doors, violence in the home is thought to be a widespread social problem. In 1994, for example, 25 034 applications were made for injunctions in the county court under the Domestic Violence and Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1976 (Judicial Statistics 1994). Domestic violence exists at all levels of society and involves not just spouses and cohabitants but other family members. Various factors have been posited for the causes of violence. Personality factors, such as psychopathic tendencies, aggression or jealousy may play a part, as may social factors, such as poverty, housing and unemployment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

  • Barnett, His Honour Judge, ‘Inherent jurisdiction, ouster orders and children’ [1997] Fam Law 96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, Domestic Violence: the New Law, Part IV of the Family Law Act1996, Family Law, Jordans, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cretney, ‘Being a nuisance’ (1993) 109 LQR 361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cretney and Davis, ‘Prosecuting “Domestic” Assault’ [1996] Crim LR 162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, ‘All in the name of privacy: domestic violence’, in Sex and Gender in the Legal Process, chap. 5, Blackstone Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, ‘Domestic violence and children’ [1995] Fam Law 82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, His Honour Judge, ‘Inherent jurisdiction, ouster and exclusion’ [1994] Fam Law 629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, ‘Non-molestation protection’ [1996] Fam Law 134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson-Cruttenden, ‘The final emergence of the tort of harassment?’ [1995] Fam Law 625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, ‘The Family Law Bill — domestic violence’ [1996] Fam Law 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones et al., ‘Domestic violence applications: an empirical study of one court’ (1995) JSWFL 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, ‘The emergence of harassment as a recognised tort’ (1993) 109 NLJ 926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, ‘Harassment — a recognised tort?’ (1993) 109 NLJ 1685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, ‘Elder abuse — the public law failure to protect’ [1995] Fam Law 257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verduyn, ‘Ouster orders now’ [1996] Fam Law 36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Kate Standley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Standley, K. (1997). Domestic Violence and Occupation of the Family Home. In: Family Law. Macmillan Law Masters. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14655-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics