Family Law pp 216-228 | Cite as

Financial Provision and Property Orders for Children

  • Kate Standley
Chapter
Part of the Macmillan Law Masters book series

Abstract

All parents, whether married or unmarried and with or without parental responsibility, have a duty to care for their children, and this includes the provision of maintenance. This maintenance obligation continues even when parental relationships break down. The right of children to be maintained and the duty of parents to provide it are also recognised in art. 27 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989.

Keywords

Europe Income Coherence Expense Dine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

  1. Bastin, ‘Europe and the CSA’ [1996] Fam Law 678.Google Scholar
  2. Bird, ‘Child support: reform or tinkering’ [1995] Fam Law 112.Google Scholar
  3. Bird, ‘Departure directions under the Child Support Act 1991’ [1997] Fam Law 112.Google Scholar
  4. Clift-Matthews, ‘The court v. the Child Support Agency’ [1996] Fam Law 474.Google Scholar
  5. Collier, ‘The campaign against the Child Support Act: ‘errant fathers’ and ‘family men’, [1994] Fam Law 384Google Scholar
  6. Eekelaar, ‘Third thoughts on child support’ [1994] Fam Law 99.Google Scholar
  7. Gillespie, ‘The Child Support Act — the hand that rocks the cradle’ [1996] Fam Law 162.Google Scholar
  8. Hilaire, ‘Reflections on the Child Support Act 1991’ (1993) 5 JCL 77.Google Scholar
  9. Jackson and Wasoff et al., ‘Financial support on Divorce: the right mixture of rules and discretion?’ (1993) IJLF 230.Google Scholar
  10. Knights and Cox, Child Support Handbook (4th edn 1996/97) Child Poverty Action Group.Google Scholar
  11. Knights, ‘Child support update’ [1997] Fam Law 120.Google Scholar
  12. Maclean and Eekelaar, ‘Child support: the British solution’ (1993) 7 IJLF 205.Google Scholar
  13. Meadows, ‘Child maintenance after the 1991 Act. The residual functions of the court’ [1994] Fam Law 96.Google Scholar
  14. Priest, ‘Capital settlements and the CSA’ [1997] Fam Law 115 and 170.Google Scholar
  15. Stone, ‘Discrimination in child maintenance’, in Dine, J. and Watt (eds.), Justifying Discrimination, Longman, 1996.Google Scholar
  16. Wingert, ‘Capital provision for children of unmarried parents’ [1994] Fam Law 194.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kate Standley 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kate Standley
    • 1
  1. 1.University of EssexUK

Personalised recommendations