Skip to main content

How the Defence Replied

  • Chapter
Book cover In the Shadow of Sharpeville

Abstract

The prosecution had made its case. It had evidence placing Ja-ja at the scene of the crime and Reid’s confession. Beyond that it rested on contradictory assertions, circumstantial innuendo, and the reliability of a single witness at odds with himself, with others and with some of the few hard facts which existed. How these accusations could be stretched to embrace Dlamini’s murder will be considered when the trial judgment is analysed. First, the response of the defence must be examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 Peter Parker and Joyce Mokhesi-Parker

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parker, P., Mokhesi-Parker, J. (1998). How the Defence Replied. In: In the Shadow of Sharpeville. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14617-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics