Abstract
The prosecution had made its case. It had evidence placing Ja-ja at the scene of the crime and Reid’s confession. Beyond that it rested on contradictory assertions, circumstantial innuendo, and the reliability of a single witness at odds with himself, with others and with some of the few hard facts which existed. How these accusations could be stretched to embrace Dlamini’s murder will be considered when the trial judgment is analysed. First, the response of the defence must be examined.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1998 Peter Parker and Joyce Mokhesi-Parker
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parker, P., Mokhesi-Parker, J. (1998). How the Defence Replied. In: In the Shadow of Sharpeville. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14617-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14617-8_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-14619-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-14617-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)