Reform — Past and Present

  • Robert East
Chapter
Part of the Macmillan Law Masters book series (PMLM)

Abstract

Throughout the 1950s, 60s and 70s there was a basic consensus between the major British political parties that saw them largely embrace, albeit with some differences of opinion, the central tenets of Beveridge’s ideas modified by the fact that, when in power, both the Labour and Conservative parties had allowed means-tested benefits to assume a far greater importance in the provision of social security than was envisaged by Sir William Beveridge. However, the four sucessive Conservative governments of 1979 to 1997 brought a fundamental change in approach. Rejecting Beveridge’s idea that the state should provide financial assistance ‘from the cradle to the grave’ to those deemed to be in need, reforms were directed towards reducing the role of the state in providing financial support to those in need. This manifested itself in a number of ways. Most obviously, from 1980 benefits were uprated in line with prices rather than with wages, the consequence of which was that benefit levels fell sharply in comparison to the standard of living enjoyed by those not having to resort to state support, e.g. between 1978 and 1987 a married couple’s normal entitlement to supplementary benefit fell from 61% of personal disposable income per capita to 53%. Secondly, increased conditions were imposed on eligibility for entitlement to benefits. Thus, as an example, in 1989 the requirement to be ‘actively seeking work’ was added to that of being ‘available for work’ for those claiming unemployment benefit while, when jobseeker’s allowance replaced unemployment benefit in 1996, a further requirement of needing to agree a ‘jobseeker’s agreement’ was also imposed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Burges, L. (1987) ‘Does workfare work?’ 68 Poverty.Google Scholar
  2. Deacon, A. (1997) ‘The case for compulsion’, 98 Poverty autumn,Google Scholar
  3. quoting L. Mead, The New Politics of Poverty, Basic Books, New York, 1992, p. 172.Google Scholar
  4. Hill, M. (1990) Social Security Policy in Britain, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  5. Hutton, W. (1998) ‘After the rhetoric, the reality’, The Observer, 29 March.Google Scholar
  6. Hutton, W. (1999) ‘Now for Gordo’s latest trick’, The Observer, 14 March 1999.Google Scholar
  7. The Independent (1998) ‘Building a Modern Welfare State’ A speech by Tony Blair, Prime Minister, in Dudley on 15 January 1998, reported 16 January.Google Scholar
  8. Layard, R. and Philpott, J. (1990) Stopping Unemployment, Employment Policy Institute, London, 1990, quoted in Deacon (1997).Google Scholar
  9. MacDermott, T., Garnham, A. and Holtermann, S. (1998) Real Choices for Lone Parents and their Children, Child Poverty Action Group.Google Scholar
  10. Reith, L. (1998) ‘Welfare Reform — a threat to disability benefits?’, Disability Rights Bulletin, spring.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Robert East 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert East
    • 1
  1. 1.School of LawUniversity of GlamorganUK

Personalised recommendations