Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Information Systems Series ((INSYS))

Abstract

Chapter 4 will explore the concept of management. The first section contains a brief overview of the development of the management concept and of some of the current archetypes of management. Although these concepts are helpful, they do not provide a framework to explore the issues of the management concept. For this purpose the concepts of systems and cybernetics will be explored as a, hopefully, more appropriate perspective or point of reference. Firstly, classical, first-order cybernetics will be discussed. This cybernetics perspective has the advantage that the concepts of management can be explained in very general and conceptual terms in order to reveal more of the actual issues of management. This analysis will show that management faces a fundamental problem that cannot be solved within the first-order perspective. Secondly, the more recently developed second-order cybernetic and systemic concepts of autopoiesis and self-organization will be examined. These theories will lead us to the core of the issues faced by management today. In the final section, these principles of second-order cybernetics and systems will be applied to the management situation to define some general principles of self-organising management. The logical structure of this chapter is depicted in Figure 4.1.

Everything must be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.

Albert Einstein

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackoff, R.L. (1971), ‘Towards a System of Systems Concepts’, Management Science, 17, 11, 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1993), Knowledge for Action, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W.R. (1957), An Introduction to Cybernetics, New York, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1985), Diagnosing the System for Organizations, New York, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1982), The Turning Point: Science, Society and the Rising Culture, London, Fontana Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C.W. (1968), The Systems Approach, New York, Delacorte Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C.W. (1971), The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organization, New York, Basic Books Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, J.H. and Gibson, J.L. (1990), Fundamentals of Management, Homewood, Boston, BPI Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P.F. (1974), Management: Tasks, Responsibilities and Practices, London, Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P.F. (1978), Post-capitalist Society, Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R.L. and Carson, E.R. (1988), Dealing with Complexity, New York, Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R.L. and Jackson, M.C. (1988), ‘Cybernetics and Organization Theory: A Critical Review’, Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 19, 13–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gemmill, G. and Smith, C. (1985), ‘A Dissipative Structure Model of Organization Transformation’, Human Relations, 38, 8, 751–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society, Berkeley, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, L. (1910), Sun Tzu on the Art of War, London, Luzac and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleik, J. (1987), Chaos: Making a New Science, London, Cardinal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellriegel, D. and Slocum, J.W. (1989), Management (5th Edition), Reading Mass., Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D.H. (1987), Management: Principles and Practices, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch, E. (1980), The Self-Organizing Universe: Scientific and Human Implications of the Emerging Paradigm of Evolution, Oxford, Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreitner, R. (1989), Management (4th Edition), Boston, Mass., Houghton Mifflin Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C.T. and Short, C. (1879), A Latin Dictionary: Founded on the Andrews’ Edition of Freund’s Latin Dictionary, Oxford, Oxford at the Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (1993), ‘Is Society a Self-Organizing System’, Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 16, 3, 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1990), Essays on self reference, New York, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. and Varela, F. (1987), The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding, Boston, Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1994), ‘The Fall and Rise of Strategic Planning’, Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb, 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994), ‘A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation’, Organization Science, 5, 1, 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pentland, B.T. and Reuter, H. (1994), ‘Organizational Routines as Grammars of Action’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 484–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. and Austin, N. (1985), A Passion for Excellence: The Leadership Difference, Glasgow, Fontana/Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I. (1985), Order out of Chaos, New York, Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S.P. (1988), Management: Concepts and Applications (2nd Edition), Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. and Gemmill, G. (1991), ‘Change in the small group: A dissipative structure perspective’, Human Relations, 44, 7, 697–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterba, R.L. (1976), ‘The Organization and Management of the Temple Corporations in Ancient Mesopotamia’, The Academy of Management Review, 1, 3, 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F.W. (1990), ‘Scientific Management’, in Pugh, D.S. (ed.), Organization Theory: Selected Readings, London, Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, G. (1993), Law as an Autopoietic System, Oxford, Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, G. and Febbrajo, A. (1992), State, Law, and Economy as Autopoietic Systems: Regulation and Autonomy in a New Perspective, Milan, Dott. A. Giuffrh Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. (1984), ‘Two Principles for Self-Organization’, in Ulrich, H. and Probst, G.J. (eds.), Self-organization and management of social systems, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Foerster, H. (1984), ‘Principles of Self-Organization — In a Socio-Managerial Context’, in Ulrich, H. and Probst, G.J. (eds), Self-organization and management of social systems, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wren, D.A. (1979), The Evolution of Management Thought (2nd Edition), New York, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B.J. (1993), ‘Chaos & Nonequilibrium: The Flip Side of Strategic Processes’, Organization Development Journal, 11, 1, 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Lucas D. Introna

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Introna, L.D. (1997). Management: and manus. In: Management, Information and Power. Information Systems Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14549-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics