Skip to main content

Introduction: why and how to think?

  • Chapter
Management, Information and Power

Part of the book series: Information Systems Series ((INSYS))

  • 123 Accesses

Abstract

This book is about responding to a different path; about thinking and listening differently, but why? I will argue that the techno-functionalist paradigm (Burrell & Morgan, 1979), the current archetype for the information systems discipline, is exhausted. In applying this paradigm to everyday world problems, anomalies are being generated and are rapidly accumulating, to the point where a serious question of legitimacy now confronts the discipline. Senior executives are questioning the return on massive investments in information technology (Strassman, 1990). Critical sociologists are questioning the ethics and efficacy of the new fordism embodied in functionally inspired interventions such as business process re-engineering (Mumford, 1996). The failure of information technology projects seems to be as pervasive as ever (Duffy, 1993; Page et al., 1993). A general uneasiness seems to prevail in many areas of the discipline.

Everything here is the path of a responding that examines as it listens. Any path always risks going astray, leading astray. To follow such paths takes practice in going. Practice needs craft. Stay on the path, in genuine need, and learn the craft of thinking, unswerving, yet erring.

Heidegger

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ashby, W.R. (1957), An Introduction to Cybernetics, New York, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avgerou, C. and Cornford, T. (1995), ‘Limitations of Information Systems Theory and Practice: A Case for Pluralism’, in Falkenberg, E. (ed.), Information Systems Concepts: Towards a consolidation of views, London, Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, R.J. (1983), ‘The In-Formation of Information Systems’, in Boland, R.J. and Hirschheim, R.A. (eds.), Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, New York, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. (1979), Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1982), The Turning Point: Science, Society and the Rising Culture, London, Fontana Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra, C.U. (1994), ‘The Grassroots of IT and Strategy’, in Ciborra, C. and Jelassi, T. (eds), Strategic Information Systems: A European Perspective, Chichester, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G.B. (1974), Management Information Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Structure and Development (2nd Edition), London, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G.B. and Olsen, M.H. (1985), Management Information Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Structure and Development (2nd Edition), London, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1982), “Differance,”Margins of Philosophy, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H.L. (1991), Being-in-the-world: a Commentary on Heideggers Being and time, Division I, Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H.L. and Dreyfus, S.E. (1986), Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer (Paperback edition, with Tom Athanasiou Edition), New York, The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P.F. (1974), Management: Tasks, Responsibilities and Practices, London, Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, M. (1993), ‘Londons Embarrassing Mistake’, Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, M. (1989), Management Strategies for Information Technology, New York, Prentice Hall (UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (1975), Against Method, London, Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (1993), Against method (3rd edition), London, Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977), ‘Truth and Power’, Gordon, C. (ed.), Power / Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings 1972–1977, New York, Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1983), ‘The Subject and Power’, Dreyfus, H.L. and Rabinow, P. (eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984), ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’, Rabinow, P. (ed.), The Foucault Reader, Middlesex, England, Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962), Being and time, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1968), What is Called Thinking, New York, Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1977), ‘The Age of the World Picture’, in Lovitt, W. (ed.), The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, New York, Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1984), The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, Bloomington, Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R. and Klein, H. (1994), ‘Realizing Emancipatory Principles in Information Systems Development: The Case for ETHICS’, MIS Quarterly, 18, 1, 83–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D.H. (1987), Management: Principles and Practices, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey., Prentice-Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Introna, L.D. (1993), ‘Information: A Hermeneutic Perspective’, The First European Conference on Information systems, Henley on Thames, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd Edition), Chicago, Ill., The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1977), The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change., Chicago, Ill., The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1986), The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Manchester, Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, K. (1986), Information Systems Development as Social Action: Framework and critical implications, University of Jyyvaskyla., Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. and Varela, F. (1987), The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding, Boston, Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, R. (1995), Management Information Systems: A study of computer based information systems, Englewoods Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, E. (1996), Systems Design: Ethical Tools for Ethical Change, Basingstoke, Macmilllan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1967), The Will to Power, New York, Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. and Courtney, J. (1992), Decision Support Models and Expert Systems, New York, Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. and Gash, D.C. (1992), ‘Changing frames: Understanding Technological Change in Organizations’, Center for Information Technology Research Working Paper, Cambridge, MA, MIT Sloan School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, D., Williams, P. and Boyd, D. (1993), “Report of the Public Inquiry into the London Ambulance Service”, London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1973), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy (1st pbk edition), London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1982), Consequences of Pragmatism, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1977), The New Science of Management Decision (2nd Edition), Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamper, R. (1988), ‘Pathologies of AI’, AI & Society, 2, 1, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strassman, P. (1990), The Business Value of Computers, New Canaan, The Information Economics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F.W. (1914), The Principles of Scientific Management, London/New York, Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1993), Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, Chichester, John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J., Griffiths, P. and Whitmore, P. (1990), Strategic Planning for Information Systems, New York, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. and Flores, F. (1987), Understanding Computers and Cognition, Massachusetts, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, C. (1985), Strategy and Computers, New York, Dow Jones-Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1956), Philosophical investigations, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Lucas D. Introna

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Introna, L.D. (1997). Introduction: why and how to think?. In: Management, Information and Power. Information Systems Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14549-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics