Skip to main content

Trade Reform with a Government Budget Constraint

  • Conference paper
International Trade Policy and the Pacific Rim

Abstract

Practical trade policy advice must usually recognize that trade taxes help to raise government revenue required for other fiscal purposes. In contrast, the theory of trade policy analysis typically uses the simplifying assumption that tariff revenue is ‘passively’ redistributed, so that a fall in revenue is offset by a fall in the lump sum transfer from the government to the private sector. The passive transfer assumption was perhaps an appropriate simplification in the economies of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in the era of rapid growth, but it is clearly inappropriate to the present concern over public debt along with resistance to tax increases or cuts in the provision of public-sector goods.1 The passive transfer assumption was never appropriate for the governments of developing nations, which are typically dependent on tariff revenue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abe, K. (1992) ‘Tariff Reform in a Small Open Economy with Public Production’, International Economic Review, vol. 33, pp. 209–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abe, K. (1995) ‘The Target Rates of Tariff and Tax Reform’, International Economic Review, vol. 36, pp. 875–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. E. (1994) ‘The Theory of Protection’, in D. Greenaway and L. A. Winters (eds), Surveys of International Trade (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. E. and W. Martin (1995) ‘The Welfare Analysis of Fiscal Policy: A Simple Unified Accounting’, mimeo, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. E. and J. P. Neary (1992) ‘Trade Reform with Quotas, Partial Rent Retention and Tariffs’, Econometrica, vol. 60, pp. 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. E. and L. Young (1992) ‘Optimal Taxation and Debt in an Open Economy’, Journal of Public Economics, no. 47, pp. 21–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, C, J. Shoven and J. Whalley (1985) ‘General Equilibrium Computations of the Marginal Welfare Cost of Taxes in the United States’, American Economic Review, vol. 75, pp. 128–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, T. J. and J. Vanek (1971) ‘The theory of Tariffs, Taxes and Subsidies: Some Aspects of the Second Best’, American Economic Review, vol. 61, pp. 925–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, M. (1972) ‘Market Distortions and Gradual Reform’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 39, pp. 373–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenery, H. B., J. Lewis, J. de Melo and S. Robinson (1986) ‘Alternative Routes to Development’, in H. B. Chenery, S. Robinson and M. Syrquin (eds), Industrialization and Growth: a Comparative Study (London: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Devarajan, S., L. Squire and S. Suthiwart-Narueput (1995) ‘Reviving Project Appraisal at the World Bank’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, no. 1496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. A. and J. Mirrlees (1971) ‘Optimal Taxation and Public Production’, American Economic Review, vol. 61, pp. 8–27 and 261–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W E., A. H. Turunen-Red and A. D. Woodland (1989) ‘Productivity-and Pareto-Improving Changes in Taxes and Tariffs’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 56, pp. 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. E., A. H. Turunen-Red and A. D. Woodland (1991) ‘Tariff Reform in a Small Open Economy with Domestic Distortions and Nontraded Goods’, International Economic Review, vol. 32, pp. 937–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethier, W J. (1995) Modern International Economics, 3rd edn (New York: Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Falvey, R. (1994) ‘Revenue Enhancing Tariff Reform’, CREDIT Paper 94/5, University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, E. and H. Sonnenschein (1970) ‘Price Distortion and Economic Welfare’, Econometrica, vol. 38, pp. 281–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. and E. Helpman (1994) ‘Protection for Sale’, American Economic Review, vol. 84, pp. 833–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatta, T. (1977) ‘A Theory of Piecemeal Policy Recommendations’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 44, pp. 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. (1989) The Political Economy of Protection (New York: Harwood Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, P. (1974) ‘A More General Theory of Price Distortions in Open Economies’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 4, pp. 365–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, R. and A. Panagariya (1992) ‘On the Theory of Piecemeal Tariff Reform: The Case of Pure Imported Intermediate Inputs’, American Economic Review, vol. 82, pp. 615–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagariya, A. (1992) ‘Input Tariffs, Duty Drawbacks and Tariff Reform’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 32, pp. 131–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. (1927) ‘A Contribution to the Theory of Taxation’, Economic Journal, vol. 37, pp. 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squire, L. (1989) ‘Project Evaluation in Theory and Practice’, in H. Chenery and T. N. Srinivasan (eds), Handbook of Development Economics, vol. II (Amsterdam: Elsevier).

    Google Scholar 

  • Abe, K. (1992) ‘Tariff Reform in a Small Open Economy with Public Production’, International Economic Review, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 209–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, E. and N. Stern (1984) ‘The Theory of Reform and Indian Indirect Taxes’, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 259–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, E. and N. Stern (1991) The Theory and Practice of Tax Reform in Developing Countries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W E., A. Turunen-Red and A. Woodland (1989) ‘Productivity and Pareto Improving Changes in Taxes and Tariffs’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 56, pp. 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. and V. Norman (1980) Theory of International Trade (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hatta, T. (1977) ‘A Recommendation for a Better Tariff Structure’, Econometrica, vol. 45, pp. 1859–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konishi, H. (1995) ‘A Pareto-Improving Commodity Tax Reform under a Smooth Nonlinear Income Tax’, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 56, pp. 413–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, S. and P. Raimondos-Moller (1997) ‘On the Tying of Aid to Tariff Reform’, Journal of Development Economics, vol. 54, no. 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turunen-Red, A. and A. Woodland (1993) ‘Partial Tariff and Quota Reform in a Small Open Economy’, mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Texas at Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodland, A. (1985) ‘Recent Developments in the Theory of Tariff Reform’, mimeo, University of Sydney, Department of Econometrics.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 International Economic Association

About this paper

Cite this paper

Anderson, J.E., Turunen-Red, A. (1999). Trade Reform with a Government Budget Constraint. In: Piggott, J., Woodland, A. (eds) International Trade Policy and the Pacific Rim. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14543-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics