Skip to main content

Do Two Wrongs Make a Right? Export Incentives and Bias in Trade Policy

  • Conference paper
International Trade Policy and the Pacific Rim

Abstract

In the large literature on export promotion and South-East Asian trade policy, there is a tradition, going back at least to Corden (1971), of emphasizing the offsetting consequences of export promotion in the presence of protection of domestic industry. It is often claimed that the anti-export bias of protection is removed, or ‘neutralized’, by export incentives. Thus, the combined presence of fairly high levels of protection with equally large doses of export incentives results in an allocation of resources similar to that produced by a policy of unilateral free trade. On theoretical grounds, this proposition derives support from the familiar competitive production (supply-side) model of a small, open economy. In that model the relative output of exportables and importables is determined by the internal product price ratio. Given tariffs on imports, export subsidies can be used to restore the internal producer price ratio to the external world price ratio.2 One could summarize by saying that this is an example in economic policy where ‘two wrongs make a right’; that is, while each policy individually would reduce welfare, jointly they produce an outcome that is optimal.

The authors are grateful for the helpful comments of conference participants Rod Falvey, Don White and an anonymous referee. Remaining errors are the responsibility of the authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bliss, C. (1987) ‘Taxation, Cost Benefit Analysis and Effective Protection’, in D. Newberry and N. Stern (eds), The Theory of Taxation for Developing Countries (Oxford: Oxford University Press / World Bank), pp. 141–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corden, M. (1971) The Theory of Protection (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. E., A. H. Turunen-Red and A. D. Woodland (1991) ‘Tariff Reform in a Small Open, Multi-Household Economy with Domestic Distortions and Nontraded Goods’, International Economic Review, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 937–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, H. and S. Stykolt (1960) ‘A Model for the Study of Protected Oligopolies’, Economic Journal, vol. 70, pp. 336–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falvey, R. E. and N. Gemmell (1990a) ‘Compensatory Financial and Fiscal Incentives to Export’, in C. R. Milner (ed.), Export Promotion Strategies: Theory and Evidence (Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf), pp. 109–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falvey, R. E. and N. Gemmell (1990b) ‘Trade Taxes and Welfare: The Case of Export Incentives in South-East Asian Countries’, Australian Economic Review, 4th quarter, pp. 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flatters, F. and R. G. Harris (1995) ‘Trade and Investment: Patterns and Policy Issues in the Asia-Pacific Rim’, in W. Dobson and F. Flatters (eds), Pacific Trade and Investment: Options for the 90’s (Kingston: John Deutsch Institute for the Study of Economic Policy).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. and N. Schmitt (1996a) ‘Protection and Market Closure’, mimeo, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. and N. Schmitt (1996b) ‘Export-Investment Subsidies in the Presence of Import Protection’, mimeo, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. (1989) The Political Economy of Protection (Chur: Harwood).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horstmann, I. and J. Markusen (1987) ‘Strategic Investment and the Development of Multinationals’, International Economic Review, vol. 16, pp. 205–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J. (1984) ‘Multinationals, Multiplant Economies and the Gains from Trade’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 32, pp. 103–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melvin, J. M. and J. D. Warne (1973) ‘Monopoly and the Theory of International Trade’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 3, pp. 117–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam, C. H. (1990) ‘Export Promotion Strategy and Economic Development in Korea’, in Milner (ed.), Export Promotion Strategies: Theory and Evidence (Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf), pp. 165–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turunen-Red, A. and A. D. Woodland (1991) ‘Strict Pareto-Improving Multilateral Reforms of Tariffs’, Econometrica, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1127–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (1990) Governing the Market (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Warr, P. (1990) ‘Export Processing Zones’, in C. R. Milner (ed.), Export Promotion Strategies: Theory and Evidence (Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf), pp. 130–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 International Economic Association

About this paper

Cite this paper

Harris, R.G., Schmitt, N., Falvey, R. (1999). Do Two Wrongs Make a Right? Export Incentives and Bias in Trade Policy. In: Piggott, J., Woodland, A. (eds) International Trade Policy and the Pacific Rim. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14543-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics