Abstract
During the First World War, motherhood was used as a central way to define female identity and promote a sense of unity among women. A variety of social commentators and activists voiced new pronatalist concern over women as mothers, producers of the national resource of the next generation of soldiers. However, a different sort of widespread interest in motherhood emerged in debates about state support for dependent women, and these discussions touched off further controversy over how to regard and regulate wartime female sexual behaviour leading to illegitimate births. This public focus on sexuality, motherhood, and illegitimacy must be considered in the context of the war’s unexpected death tolls; the war’s costs and longevity soon undermined the belief that this would be a short war and a quick victory for Britain. Thus many wartime commentators began to view Britain’s declining birthrate as further weakening the nation by creating additional casualties; some felt that even illegitimate motherhood should perhaps be encouraged. Court records about abortion and infanticide indicate that women continued to make decisions about their pregnancies that contradicted some of their social mandate to reproduce for the sake of the country, yet they did so in a climate that seemed newly aware of the significance of maternity for national, political ends.1 Motherhood came to represent for women what soldiering did for men: a gender-specific experience that could provide social unity and stability during a time of unprecedented upheaval.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works Cited
Bland, Lucy (1985), ‘In the Name of Protection: The Policing of Women in the First World War’, in Julia Brophy and Carol Smart (eds), Women in Law: Explorations in Law, Family and Sexuality (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul), pp. 23–49.
Brittain, Vera (1933), Testament of Youth: An Autobiographical Study of the Years 1900–1925 (London: Virago, 1978).
Daily Chronicle (1915), ‘Care of War Babies’ (23 April).
Daily Telegraph (1915), ‘Women and War Service’ (2 June).
Davidson, Edith M., M. Dorothy Harmer and Evelyn Burge (1914), ‘A Nation’s Appeal to our Girls’, The Vigilance Record (November), p. 84.
Drew, Mary (1915), ‘Letter to the Editor’, Manchester Guardian (26 April).
Fawcett, Mrs Henry (1914), ‘Mobilizing Women’, Church Family Newsletter (25 November).
Grayzel, Susan R. (1994), ‘Women’s Identities at War: The Cultural Politics of Gender in Britain and France, 1914–1919’, PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
Harrison, Austin (1915), ‘For the Unborn’, The English Review (May), pp. 231–6.
Herts. Advertiser (1915), ‘The Suffragettes and the War Babies’ (15 May).
Kent, Susan Kingsley (1993), Making Peace: The Reconstruction of Gender in Interwar Britain, (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Levine, Philippa. ‘“Walking the Streets in a Way No Decent Woman Should”: Women Police in World War I’, Journal of Modern History, 66 (March), pp. 34–78.
Longman, Mary (1915), ‘Letter to the Editor’, Manchester Guardian (26 April 1915).
Manchester Daily Dispatch (1915), ‘Primate’s Speech’ (28 April).
Manchester Guardian (1915a), ‘The Unmarried Mother’ (23 February).
Manchester Guardian (1915b), ‘The War Babies: No Definite Information Obtainable’ (27 April).
Manchester Guardian (1915c), ‘The War Babies’ (29 April).
Morning Advertiser (1915), ‘Bishop and the War Baby Delusion’ (7 June 1915).
Pankhurst, Sylvia (1932), The Home Front: A Mirror to Life in England during the First World War (London: Cresset, 1987).
Parliamentary Debates (Commons) (1915) 5th series, vol. 71.
Pedersen, Susan (1990), ‘Gender, Welfare, and Citizenship in Britain during the Great War’, American Historical Review, 95.4, pp. 983–1006.
Pedersen, Susan (1993), Family, Dependence and the Origins of the Welfare State: Britain and France 1914–1945 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Peto, D. O. G. (1915), ‘The Return’, The Englishwoman, No. 83 (November), pp. 163–75.
Scharlieb, Mary (1916), The Hidden Scourge (London: C. Arthur Pearson).
Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Families Association (SSFA) (1915), The Thirtieth Annual Report 1914–1915 (London: Eyre & Spottiswoode).
The Standard (1915a), ‘Archbishop of York’s Report’ (18 June).
The Standard (1915b), ‘Report of the Sub-Committee’ (18 June).
Stopes, Marie Carmichael (1918), The Race: A New Play of Life (London: A. C. Fifield).
Streatfield, Lucy Deane, and Harriet Whining (1915), ‘Letter to the Editor’, Morning Post (15 April).
‘United Suffragist’ (1915), ‘Letter to the Editor’, Liverpool Courier (3 May).
The Vigilance Record (1914), ‘Separation Allowances for the Unmarried’ (December), p. 91.
The Vigilance Record (1915), ‘The Problem of the Unmarried Mother’ (May), pp. 39–40.
Woollacott, Angela (1994a), ‘“Khaki Fever” and its Control: Gender, Class, Age and Sexual Morality on the British Homefront in the First World War’, Journal of Contemporary History, 29.2, pp. 325–48.
Woollacott, Angela (1994b), On Her Their Lives Depend: Munitions Workers in the Great War (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grayzel, S.R. (1997). ‘The Mothers of Our Soldiers’ Children’. In: Nelson, C., Holmes, A.S. (eds) Maternal Instincts. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14534-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14534-8_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-14536-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-14534-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)